NY Suit Against OCC Could Delay Regulatory Clarity for Fintech Companies
But New York's Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo again filed a lawsuit Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that could further delay national regulation of fintech companies, lawyers said. DFS previously filed a suit hoping to block the OCC charter, but it was dismissed as premature last December.
September 17, 2018 at 04:37 PM
4 minute read
Financial technology companies have long sought regulatory clarity on a federal scale—and they almost had it, with the federal Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's July announcement that it would accept national bank charter applications from nondepository fintech companies.
But New York's Department of Financial Services' suit, Vullo v. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 18-cv-8377, filed Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, could further delay national regulation, some practitioners said. DFS previously filed a suit last year hoping to block the OCC charter but federal Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald dismissed the the suit in December, saying it was premature.
Maria Vullo, the superintendent of New York's DFS, said in Friday's complaint that the fintech charter decision is “lawless, ill-conceived, and destabilizing of financial markets” and that it “puts New York financial consumers—and often the most vulnerable ones—at great risk of exploitation by federally-chartered entities.” The lawsuit argues that the OCC cannot offer national bank charters to fintech companies because, if they are not banks, the OCC does not have the authority to regulate them. Vullo and the DFS had no additional comment Monday. Vullo asked the court to bar the OCC from implementing the federal court's decision in July to start accepting applications for charters. Other states have also indicated their intention to refile similar lawsuits.
The OCC insists that it does have the authority to regulate fintechs. “The agency is confident in its authority to grant national bank charters, including special purpose national bank charters, to companies that are engaged in the business of banking, meet the qualifications for becoming a national bank, and apply to conduct business as part of the federal banking system,” said the OCC's director of public affairs Bryan Hubbard in a statement Monday. “The agency will vigorously defend that authority, but will not comment on pending or potential litigation.”
Catherine Brennan, a partner at Hudson Cook in Hanover, Maryland who works with national and state banks and financial companies, said on Monday, “whether or not New York is successful, they have a victory in that they have set the line with regard to what it wants from companies it might regulate in New York State.”
Brennan continued, “New York State is obviously a huge financial market and there will be some fintech companies that would be discouraged from even considering the OCC charter because of the DFS action. Anyone at a fintech company will need to weigh in the worth of the charter versus getting involved in a legal dispute with the Department” of Financial Services.
Companies who may have been drawn toward the OCC charter may now wait and see how the suit plays out before sinking resources into it, she said.
The charter would allow fintech companies to be regulated more like a bank on a national scale. Currently, most fintech companies operate under state regulations that vary in each jurisdiction. The confusion that stems from that can make business difficult and be a competitive disadvantage on a global scale, said Jeffrey Alberts, a Pryor Cashman partner who co-heads the firm's financial institutions group.
“A lot of fintech companies are frustrated about the fact that they're currently subject to regulation by dozens of different state regulators and they are excited about the possibility that with the OCC fintech charter there would be one regulator, and they would be able to deal with just that one regulator and just that one set of regulations,” he said.
But Alberts, like Brennan, said the DFS suit could be a roadblock for fintech companies who had sought the national bank charter. It's not clear whether the national charter would be available long term.
“Now that the DFS has sued the OCC, I think fintech companies are reluctant to invest resources into getting that charter because they won't know what the status of this pre-emption is,” Alberts said. “In essence, until the solution is resolved, they would be subject to regulation both by the OCC and by the states, and wouldn't know who ultimately was going to win.”
Alberts added there have been concerns raised by traditional banks that the national charter will give fintech companies a competitive advantage, as it would allow the latter to operate with lower capital requirements under its regulation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readThe CFPB Is Digging In for Last Days of Biden's Term. But What Happens Next?
6 minute readNY AG James Targets Crypto Fraud Which Allegedly Ensnared Victims With Fake Jobs
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250