Trump Pushes Back on Ex-'Apprentice' Contestant's Effort to Get Info About More Accusers
President Donald Trump is pushing back against an effort by a woman suing him for defamation for the president to produce information about other women who have accused him of sexual harassment, deriding it as a means to harass and distract him from his official duties.
September 17, 2018 at 03:23 PM
5 minute read
President Donald Trump is pushing back against an effort by a woman suing him for defamation for the president to produce information about other women who have accused him of sexual harassment, deriding it as a means to harass him and distract him from his official duties.
Summer Zervos, a former contestant on NBC's “The Apprentice” who appeared on the show when Trump was a host and who alleged Trump groped her in 2007, argued that information about a dozen other women who accused Trump of sexual misconduct is relevant to her defamation suit against the president because it might show patterns of behavior—namely that he lures women under false pretenses and subjects them to sudden sexual contact—and that he acted maliciously.
Zervos alleged Trump kissed her on the lips during a meeting at Trump Tower and that he subjected her to unwanted kissing and touching during a private meeting at a Beverly Hills hotel.
Zervos' suit centers on Trump's denials of Zervos' allegations—in one statement he said that he never met Zervos at the hotel where she said the groping occurred or “greeted her inappropriately.”
“That is not who I am as a person, and it is not how I've conducted my life,” Trump said, according to court papers.
Zervos said Trump defamed her by calling her a liar.
Trump “did not merely call Ms. Zervos a liar,” said Zervos' lawyers in a motion to compel. “He insisted unequivocally that he had never inappropriately touched any woman.”
Zervos argued that information about the other accusers could speak to both Trump's state of mind and his credibility. Trump's attorneys have argued that his allegedly defamatory statements amounted to heated campaign rhetoric.
Many of the other accusers said they were assaulted in “virtually” the same way that Zervos was, she alleged: Trump “would proceed to kiss them on the mouth and grope them, including by grabbing their breasts, buttocks or vaginas.”
Zervos cited as an example allegations by adult film actress Stephanie Clifford, who performs as Stormy Daniels, who said Trump invited her to meet him at a hotel in 2007 under the pretense of discussing a business opportunity but instead began touching her and discussing a previous sexual encounter they had.
Michael Cohen, Trump's former personal lawyer, admitted last month in federal court to making a $130,000 payment to Clifford on Trump's behalf to keep her encounters with Trump from going public.
Accusers identified in Zervos' suit made their allegations public in the weeks leading up to the 2016 presidential election and Trump issued blanket denials of any sexual misconduct in speeches and tweets.
“Nothing ever happened with any of these women,” Trump tweeted in October 2016. “Totally made up nonsense to steal the election.”
Zervos is represented by Cuti Hecker Wang partners Mariann Meier Wang and Eric Hecker and associates Daniel Mullkoff and Heather Gregorio. Wang declined to comment.
In opposition papers, the lawyers defending Trump in the defamation case argue that information about Trump's other accusers is not relevant to the Zervos case, characterizing the motion as a fishing expedition that would turn the case into a series of mini-trials.
Trump's lawyers also note that none of the other accusers identified in Zerovs' motion have come forward with lawsuits of their own.
Kasowitz Benson Torres attorneys Marc Kasowitz, Christine Montenegro and Paul Burgo are defense counsel to Trump in the defamation case.
Trump's efforts to thwart Zervos' lawsuit, which was filed in state court in Manhattan, have proven unsuccessful thus far: Earlier this year, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Jennifer Schecter, who presides over the case, found that Trump is not immune from the suit and in June the New York Court of Appeals declined to hear Trump's appeal to grant a stay of proceedings in the case.
Trump is appealing Schecter's ruling on the immunity matter. This month, the parties agreed to a stipulation that provides for Trump to give written answers to deposition questions.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250