Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn Agrees to Record $27.5M Settlement With Sex Abuse Victims
In one of the biggest settlement agreements reached in New York for survivors of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn has agreed to pay $27.5 million to four persons who alleged they had been abused as children by a volunteer at the St. Lucy-St. Patrick's church in Brooklyn, the plaintiffs' lawyers in the case said Tuesday.
September 18, 2018 at 05:13 PM
5 minute read
In one of the biggest settlement agreements reached in New York for survivors of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church, the Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn has agreed to pay $27.5 million to four persons who alleged they had been abused as children by a volunteer at the St. Lucy-St. Patrick's church in Brooklyn, the plaintiffs' lawyers in the case said Tuesday.
Under the settlement agreement, which resolves a case filed in Brooklyn Supreme Court in 2013, each of the four accusers would receive more than $6.8 million each. That figure would be in the upper echelons for individual awards to survivors of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church that have been made public, according to databases and other sources familiar with the litigation.
“While nothing can undo the terrible abuse and harm inflicted on these boys this settlement is a way of ensuring they get the help they need not just now but for the rest of their lives,” said Ben Rubinowitz, a managing attorney at Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf who represented the accusers.
Gair, Gair, Conason attorney Peter Saghir also appeared on behalf of the accusers.
The diocese was represented by Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt.
Calls left with defense counsel were not immediately returned.
The settlement comes as the tally for payouts by the Catholic Church in sex abuse cases has grown to $3 billion and 19 dioceses and religious orders have filed for bankruptcy protection because of sexual abuse scandals involving clergy, according to a database maintained on the bishop-accountability.org website.
It also comes about a month after a Pennsylvania grand jury released a bombshell report alleging that 300 members of clergy abused more than 1,000 victims over a period of decades; in recent weeks, New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood announced that her office would launch a civil investigation into sexual abuse cases in the state's dioceses.
Before the settlement in the Brooklyn case was made public on Tuesday, the largest publicly disclosed payout to survivors of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church was a $11.45 million jury award against the Diocese of Rockville Centre on Long Island on behalf of two victims.
According to a news release from the attorneys representing the four survivors in the Brooklyn case, between 2003 and 2009, Angelo Serrano, a volunteer and director of religious studies at St. Lucy-St. Patrick's, allegedly abused the plaintiffs when they were between the ages of 8 and 12 years old.
Court papers said Serrano fondled children in church offices and in an apartment building, where Serrano lived, near the church. Saghir said in the news release that priests supervising Serrano ignored numerous warning signs that abuse may be taking place; one priest testified that, in one instance, he saw Serrano kiss a boy as young as 8 years old on the mouth and embrace him inappropriately, but did not report the behavior.
“Since the sex abuse scandal in Boston was exposed in 2002 the Catholic Church has sought to institute policies to protect children from sexual abuse but it clearly has not done enough to ensure its own policies are being followed,” Saghir said. “Children are still being hurt.”
In 2009, according to court papers and media reports, Serrano was arrested for molesting a 10-year-old boy, and police said at the time that they were investigating up to 17 other abuse cases involving Serrano.
In 2011, Serrano was convicted of sexual abuse and received a 15-year prison sentence, court papers state.
Two years later, a boy who alleged that he was the victim of abuse at the hands of Serrano filed suit against the Brooklyn diocese, the church and two priests alleging negligent hiring, training, retention and supervision.
In a 2017 ruling to partially deny summary judgment for the defendants to dismiss the claims, Acting Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Loren Baily-Schiffman said that Serrano was held out as a “respected church authority,” even after church staff witnessed him commit inappropriate acts.
“The record in this case is replete with evidence of Serrano's inappropriate behavior with sexual implications that continued for years even after he was told to stop,” the judge found.
Following the announcement of the settlement, the diocese issued a written statement noting that another defendant, a local after-school program, contributed a portion of the settlement monies and that Serrano was not an employee of the diocese.
The diocese also “highly contested” its role in the sexual abuse of the four survivors, the statement reads.
“We hope this is another step forward in the healing process for these claimants,” the statement reads. “The diocese remains committed to ensuring that its parishes, schools and youth programs remain safe and secure for the young people who are entrusted to our care.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllManhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
White & Case Settles Wrongful Conviction Lawsuit With City Agreeing to Pay $9.45 Million
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250