Former Spotify Exec Alleges in Suit That Company Puts Up With Bias Toward Women
Former sales executive Hong Perez said during her time with the company she became increasingly concerned about its culture with regard to how women are treated.
September 19, 2018 at 04:13 PM
3 minute read
A former sales executive for Spotify alleges in a gender discrimination suit filed in Manhattan that the streaming music giant tolerates bias against women and gives favorable treatment to male employees—of whom some, she says, took part in “boys' trips” with co-workers to strip clubs and film festivals.
Hong Perez, a former sales executive who began working with Spotify in 2015 and says she received positive reviews on her job performance during her tenure, said during her time with the company she became increasingly concerned about its culture with regard to how women are treated.
Perez alleges in a suit filed in Manhattan Supreme Court that the boys' club tone of the company was set by people in other leadership positions, including her boss Brian Berner, whom she says engineered her termination to make her a scapegoat for getting into “hot water” with his own superiors over a deal he brokered to obtain concert tickets.
She alleges that in 2016 and 2017, Berner took all-male groups from Spotify's sales management team with him to the Sundance Film Festival, despite the fact that there are women working in senior sales positions. The trips, which were referred to internally as Berner's “boys' trips,” included stories of Spotify employees using drugs and getting into physical altercations that she says went unpunished.
Perez also alleges that Berner and Spotify's global head of sales, who is unnamed in her complaint, gave higher pay raises and equity to men when compared with women; and that the head of sales and a male-only group of managers went to Atlantic City for a purported “business trip” in which they attended strip clubs.
Perez is bringing her gender discrimination claims under New York City and New York State human rights laws and an equal pay discrimination claim under the state Labor Law. She has also brought a defamation claim against the company, alleging that after her termination, Berner sent an email to hundreds of employees and executives stating that Perez was fired for violating Spotify's code of conduct.
A Spotify spokeswoman said in an email that the company is not commenting on Perez's specific allegations but said her claims are “without merit.”
“At Spotify, we do not tolerate discrimination of any kind at any level,” the spokeswoman said.
Perez is represented by Randolph, New Jersey-based attorney Seth Rafkin.
Spotify is no stranger to legal challenges, though Perez's lawsuit stands out for the fact that it addresses the company's internal culture.
In June 2017, the streaming service agreed to plunk down more than $43.4 million to settle a class action suit filed by songwriters who alleged that they weren't being paid for their work. Three similar suits were filed in the months to follow, with the plaintiff in one of the suits—which seeks $1.6 billion—claiming that the June 2017 settlement was inadequate.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllUS Judge Rejects Morgan Stanley Reconsideration Bid in Deferred Compensation Litigation
US Bankruptcy Filings Rise 16.2% as Interest Rates, Inflation, and End of COVID Relief Hit Hard
3 minute readTrump Win Ignites Global Legal Market: Lawyers Prepare for High Demand & Uncertainty
Judge Orders Rudy Giuliani to Court Amid Allegations He's Hiding Assets Under Receivership
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 3Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 4Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250