Simpson Thacher Settles With Recruiter Over Sullivan & Cromwell Hire
The deal to end litigation over a partner placement came as Simpson Thacher faced the potential release of more internal firm documents.
September 19, 2018 at 02:18 PM
3 minute read
After discovery disputes about the confidentially of internal firm documents, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett has settled a recruiter's lawsuit that claimed the law firm failed to pay a placement fee for recruiting a former Sullivan & Cromwell partner.
“The action has been settled on confidential terms,” said Boston Executive Search Associates' attorney, Douglas Salvesen, of Boston-based Yurko, Salvesen & Remz, in a statement to ALM Wednesday.
Attorneys for Simpson Thacher and Boston Executive filed a stipulation in Manhattan federal court Tuesday to dismiss the suit with prejudice. Alan Turner, the Simpson Thacher partner representing the firm in the suit, did not return a message seeking comment.
The settlement came after the firm faced the prospect of the release of more internal firm documents. The parties were ordered to finish fact discovery Sept. 14, and a judge in recent months had rejected the firm's request to keep a firm memo confidential.
Boston Executive filed the suit against Simpson Thacher late last year, claiming it had introduced Michael Torkin, a Sullivan & Cromwell partner, to the firm, leading to his hire at Simpson Thacher. Boston Executive said Simpson Thacher owed it a standard recruiting fee of 25 percent of Torkin's expected first-year compensation, about $3.75 million, which would equal $937,500. The suit said Simpson Thacher has balked at paying any fee.
Proposing to amend its suit, Boston Executive also claimed its alleged damages expanded based on learning that the law firm may have paid the restructuring partner a $1 million signing bonus.
In defense, Simpson Thacher said in court filings that there was no written contract and that the recruiting agency was seeking “the benefit of a bargain it never made; payment of a fee that it never sought until after the fact, and that Simpson [Thacher] never agreed to pay.”
Earlier in the case, U.S. District Judge Lorna Schofield of the Southern District of New York, citing “sensitive business information” related to Simpson Thacher, sealed a letter on the docket and ordered other documents in the case sealed or redacted as well.
In one of the latest discovery disputes in the case, the parties tussled over a one-page July 2016 memo from firm chairman William Dougherty appointing six Simpson Thacher lawyers as internal “firm counsel” for disputes.
Simpson Thacher said the 2016 memo was a “private, confidential, and sensitive internal firm communication.” But Salvesen, the recruiting agency's attorney, urged the judge to order that the memo be redesignated as nonconfidential, calling Simpson Thacher's strict demand for the confidentiality of the document “silly.”
Ultimately, Schofield ordered that the memo shouldn't be treated as confidential under a protective order.
The memo shows the firm appointed six lawyers as firm counsel for “conflicts, ethics and liability matters related to the firm,” including Joseph Kaufman, Alan Klein, Joseph McLaughlin, J. Alden Millard, Lynn Neuner and Kathy Rose. The document was placed on the docket just days before the parties dismissed the suit.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNeighboring States Have Either Passed or Proposed Climate Superfund Laws—Is Pennsylvania Next?
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Pogo Stick Maker Wants Financing Company to Pay $20M After Bailing Out Client
- 2Goldman Sachs Secures Dismissal of Celebrity Manager's Lawsuit Over Failed Deal
- 3Trump Moves to Withdraw Applications to Halt Now-Completed Sentencing
- 4Trump's RTO Mandate May Have Some Gov't Lawyers Polishing Their Resumes
- 5A Judge Is Raising Questions About Docket Rotation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250