Ex-Acting GC Hits NY-Based Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings With Federal Gender Discrimination Suit
In a federal lawsuit filed in New York, Jennifer Fischman accuses Mitsubishi, as well as several of its affiliates and company executives, of passing over her for the permanent role of GC and COO in favor of a less-qualified, younger and less-experienced male attorney.
September 20, 2018 at 09:15 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
The former acting general counsel and chief compliance officer at New York-based Mitsubishi Chemical Holdings America Inc. has sued the company in federal court, alleging that she is the victim of gender discrimination.
Her suit describes the company as “a culture devoid of any real diversity or equality for women.”
The plaintiff, Jennifer Fischman, accuses Mitsubishi of passing her over for the permanent role of GC and COO in favor of a less-qualified, younger and less-experienced male attorney, according to the complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York earlier this month.
The suit also alleges that Fischman was illegally fired after speaking out against wrongful discrimination against herself and other female employees.
“The Company went out of its way to support its discrimination by laying a false foundation for its conduct, first in Ms. Fischman's demotion and then in her termination,” the complaint, filed by attorneys at Valli Kane & Vagnini, said. In addition to affiliated Mitsubishi companies, it also names as defendants the current GC, former GC and current president and 10 anonymous Mitsubishi directors, officers and board members. The suit seeks an undetermined amount of money damages.
Neither the plaintiff's attorney nor a representative for Mitsubishi was immediately available for comment.
According to the complaint, Fischman, on the basis of annual high performance evaluations, moved up through the ranks of Mitsubishi's legal department, first as corporate counsel from 2009 to 2012 and then as assistant GC beginning in 2013.
At the end of 2014, then-GC Donna Costa told Fischman that beginning in April 2015, Costa would be promoted to president and Fischman to acting GC and COO. Costa also said it would be unlikely that Fischman would ever be promoted to that role on anything more than a temporary basis, despite her strong performance as assistant general counsel.
“Ms. Fischman understood Ms. Costa's statement that she would be promoted to General Counsel on an 'acting' basis to mean that the Company would not tolerate another woman in its executive leadership,” according to the complaint. “Women are not meaningfully represented within the senior levels of Mitsubishi, and during the relevant time only two (2) women had any significant role at the senior levels of the Company.”
In December 2015, Nicolas Oliva took Fischman's place and became GC and COO, after which Fischman was demoted back to assistant GC and began voicing her complaints of gender discrimination to Oliva, human resources officials and senior company leaders.
In early 2017, Fischman was fired for a supposed breach of her professional ethics for allegedly approving a settlement counterproposal extended by Mitsubishi's outside counsel, without first obtaining the required consent and approval of the company executives in Japan.
“The lack of female leadership at the upper echelons of this company is astounding and shameful,” Fischman's attorney Sara Wyn Kane said in a statement. “While the glass ceiling may have some cracks in it, we as a society need to break through completely.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLong Island Midsize Firm and Managing Partner Sued for Sexual Harassment, Discrimination
6 minute readKing & Spalding Adds Veteran Antitrust Litigator From White & Case in New York
3 minute readTroutman Pepper Accused of Inattentive Case Management in $59M Malpractice Suit
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Most New Eversheds Sutherland US Partners Are in Atlanta
- 2Graffiti Showdown: Miami Clashes Over Demolition Site Cleanup Before New Year’s
- 3Phila. Jury Awards $15M to Woman Who Slipped on Apartment Building Stairs
- 4Appellate Division Greenlights State Bar's Leadership Diversity Initiatives
- 5SEC’s Latest Enforcement Actions Fuel Demand for Big Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250