NYC, Targeting Vacant 'Zombie' Properties, Files Suit Against Lenders Including Wells Fargo, Citi
Empowered by a recently enacted state law, the New York City government is stepping up enforcement on so-called “zombie properties,” vacant homes that are underwater on their mortgages, and has filed lawsuits against lenders holding onto five such properties in Brooklyn.
September 20, 2018 at 05:43 PM
4 minute read
Empowered by a recently enacted state law, the New York City government is stepping up enforcement on so-called “zombie properties,” vacant homes that are underwater on their mortgages, and has filed lawsuits against lenders holding onto five such properties in Brooklyn.
The city filed suit against Wells Fargo, CitiMortgage and three other lenders, which each hold one foreclosed property in Brooklyn, for more than $1 million in penalties for vacant properties where city inspectors found multiple code violations.
The city filed its claims against the lenders, which also includes Ocwen Loan Servicing, Rushmore Loan Management and Seterus, under the 2016 New York State Zombie Property and Foreclosure Prevention Act, which requires banks and subcontractors to regularly inspect properties that are facing foreclosure and to take over maintenance costs when properties become vacant.
The law was also intended to shorten the time that properties lie vacant by allowing mortgage holders to file for expedited foreclosure and sale judgments.
Following passage of the law, the city's Department of Housing Preservation and Development launched its Zombie Homes Initiative as a pilot program—the suits filed in Brooklyn Supreme Court, which each pertain to one to four family homes that remain vacant and distressed, are the first that the city has filed against noncompliant mortgage holders under the state law, an HPD spokesman said.
According to a release from the department, HPD's zombie home hunt, which was funded with settlements with banks that were obtained by the New York Attorney General's Office, identified up to 4,000 zombie homes throughout the city.
For the five properties named in the lawsuits, the city alleges that it notified the lenders multiple times that their properties were not in compliance with state law and did not receive responses.
Zombie homes tend to have negative effects for lenders and borrowers as well as the those who live near them, who may be subjected to eyesores that attract health and safety issues.
In one example, a neighbor living next to the zombie home at 31 Essex Street in the Highland Park section of Brooklyn, which is the property identified in the city's suit against Ocwen, told NBC 4 that the property is notorious for drawing squatters and drug users.
The city alleges that the Ocwen property has been vacant at least since Oct. 31.
Cristina Gonzalez of Linebarger Goggan Blair & Sampson, who is listed as special counsel for the city's Law Department on the five lawsuits, referred questions to HPD.
In a news release, Corporation Counsel Zachary Carter said the city's zombie homes program has had success in getting banks to maintain foreclosed properties.
“But a stubborn few financial institutions have ignored HPD's notices and have failed to meet their legal obligations to prevent these properties from becoming community eyesores,” Carter said.
Kevin Friedlander, a spokesman for Wells Fargo, said that company has not yet seen the lawsuit and thus could not comment on specific allegations.
“We work diligently to manage vacant properties for which we are responsible and in a manner that benefits the community,” Friedlander said. “This includes registering vacant properties as required by local ordinances and resolving any violations, fines or fees.”
John Lovallo, a spokesman for Ocwen, said it is conducting a “thorough review” of the status of the property identified in the lawsuit against it.
A spokesman for CitiMortgage said the company would not comment on ongoing litigation, Rushmore did not respond to a request for comment and a representative for Seterus could not be reached for comment.
According to PropertyShark, Brooklyn ranked second in the five boroughs for new foreclosure filings in the second quarter of this year, with 226; Queens led the city with 356.
Read more:
Recent Efforts to Speed Up Foreclosure Proceedings in N.Y.
Section Addresses 'Zombie Housing' and Title Agent Legislation
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Distressed M&A: Safe Harbor Protection Extends to Overarching Transfer
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250