Lancman, Launching Queens DA Run, Lays Out Reform Agenda
The Queens councilman confirmed what has long been an open secret, insisting it's time for a progressive reform agenda in the borough prosecutor's office.
September 26, 2018 at 06:00 AM
5 minute read
New York City Councilman Rory Lancman made official Wednesday his candidacy to become the next district attorney of Queens County.
Lancman's challenge to longtime incumbent District Attorney Richard Brown has been long anticipated. As the chair of the council's Justice System committee—a later iteration of a committee created after he joined the body in 2013—Lancman has made reform efforts a top priority, positioning himself as a leader on criminal justice issues.
That history is expected to serve as a foundation for Lancman, 49, to run as a progressive alternative to Brown, who was a state court judge before his long tenure as DA began in 1991.
In an early example of how Lancman seeks to contrast his approach to criminal justice to Brown's, the councilman clashed earlier this month with James Quinn, Brown's senior executive ADA, in a raucous debate before a Queens civic association over the effort to close the jail complex on Rikers Island—a plan that Brown's office has actively opposed.
For Lancman, who supports the plan to phase out Rikers and build new jail facilities in four of the five boroughs, the debate with Quinn got to the heart of why he wants to be DA.
“It just refers to this carceral philosophy that I think the public is tired of,” Lancman said in an interview. “We want a criminal justice system that isn't racist, that isn't discriminatory to the poor and that isn't gaming the system to squeeze people into pleading guilty.”
Lancman's rollout emphasized support from both local clergy members, and family members of victims of high-profile police-involved killings: Eric Garner's mother, Gwen Carr, who called Lancman the candidate who would “bring real criminal justice reform to Queens” and Sean Bell's widow Valerie Bell, who said Lancman “will not tolerate police malfeasance” as DA.
Lancman's proposals place him in the forward position of a trend of hopeful new DAs aiming to bring reform measures to the city's criminal justice system.
The line can be traced from Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s creation of a conviction review unit after assuming office in 2010 to the push for marijuana prosecution reforms started by Kenneth Thompson in Brooklyn and continued by his successor Eric Gonzalez.
If Lancman's reform agenda places him at the vanguard on issues such as ending a request for cash bail and promising to honor the spirit of the state's often manipulated speedy trial law, it puts him leagues away from the office policies in Queens as they currently stand.
Brown has made clear that his office intends to continue with policies critics see as better left in the dustbin of history.
For example, forming a conviction review unit like the one in Brooklyn that has taken part in two-dozen exonerations of wrongfully-convicted defendants, has been a nonstarter in Queens. Brown's office has openly resisted backing off low-level offense prosecutions, such as for turnstile jumping, while declining to join his Manhattan and Brooklyn colleagues calls for reform of marijuana prosecutions.
As a progressive-leaning candidate running for a countywide office in Queens, where 22 percent of voters cast ballots for President Donald Trump in the 2016 election, Lancman may face a challenge in winning over more conservative neighborhoods in the borough like Maspeth or Howard Beach.
To win over right-leaning voters, Lancman said, he said he will focus on the fiscal toll that mass incarceration takes on public coffers: The city comptroller reported last year that it costs $270,000 annually to house a single inmate on Rikers.
By offering Brown his first legitimate political threat almost one year before a likely primary election, Lancman puts pressure on Brown, 85, to make a call on whether he intends to seek another term.
While Lancman aims to occupy the progressive lane, some in the legal community maintain reservations about his left-leaning credentials. As one member of a local criminal justice reform organization familiar with Lancman and his work in the council noted, a skepticism remains about his ultimate intentions of running for DA.
“This progressive reform hat he's worn for a few years might just be a means to an end for him—a big office and more notoriety,” the individual, who sought anonymity so as not to damage a working relationship with the councilman, told the New York Law Journal. “Most folks are concerned he'll operate as a moderate in the office and fail to usher in needed change.”
Whether Brown chooses to run again, Lancman's announcement Wednesday seems likely to be the first of many as a crowded field of hopefuls eyes the race.
Those who have been mentioned as possibly having interest in running for the seat include Queens Borough President Melinda Katz, former Queens Supreme Court Justice Gregory Lasak, Bronx Criminal Court Judge George Grasso and local Court of Claims Judge Peter Vallone Jr.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 2GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 3'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 4Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
- 5Chief Assistant District Attorney and Litigator Shortlisted for Paulding County Judgeship
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250