Federal Judge Who Dated Kavanaugh Defends Character, Dismisses Anonymous Tip
In a twist in the saga over sexual misconduct allegations against U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich of the District of Columbia denies an anonymous tip suggesting she was abused by the judge in the late 1990s.
September 27, 2018 at 10:22 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
In a new twist to the saga over sexual misconduct allegations against U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, a Washington, D.C., federal judge denies she was ever physically or sexually abused by the appeals court judge when the two dated in the late 1990s.
Judge Dabney Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, in a letter sent Wednesday night to a senior lawyer on the Senate Judiciary Committee, acknowledged she dated Kavanaugh in 1998 but denied the allegations in an anonymous tip sent to a U.S. senator that suggested Kavanaugh had “shove(d)” his ex-girlfriend “against a wall.”
“… I dated Brett Kavanaugh in 1998. To the extent the attached letter is referring to me as the 'friend [who] was dating him,' the allegations it makes are both offensive and absurd,” Friedrich wrote in a letter to Mike Davis, a chief counsel for Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa.
“At no time did Brett ever shove me against a wall, including in an 'aggressive[] and sexual[]' manner. When we dated, Brett always treated me with the utmost respect, and we remain friends to this day,” Friedrich continued.
She added, “I have never observed (nor am I aware of) Brett acting in a physically inappropriate or aggressive manner toward anyone.”
Friedrich, a President Donald Trump appointee, was confirmed to the district court in December. A former federal prosecutor and Senate lawyer, she is overseeing a number of cases related to special counsel Robert Mueller III's probe, including one brought against Russian troll farm Concord Management.
The district judge also served as associate counsel in the George W. Bush White House from 2003-2006, overlapping with Kavanaugh's work in the Oval Office. Kavanaugh was a staff secretary and, later, an associate counsel for Bush.
Friedrich found herself drawn into the web of allegations against Kavanaugh a few days after an anonymous Denver tipper penned a letter to Sen. Cory Gardner, R-Colo.
The anonymous constituent wrote that her daughter, also unnamed, was among four witnesses to have seen Kavanaugh shove his then-girlfriend against a wall at a bar. The daughter, the writer of the letter said, was a friend of Kavanaugh's girlfriend.
The letter did not name the girlfriend, but Friedrich—in her Wednesday evening letter—indicated she dated Kavanaugh the year of the alleged incident.
Davis, the Senate Judiciary lawyer, informed Friedrich of the anonymous letter through a phone call on Wednesday night. He requested she provide an “immediate and written response” to the allegation.
Friedrich's letter to Davis came hours before Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford, the first woman to accuse him of sexual misconduct, testify before the Senate panel considering Kavanaugh's nomination. Ford has accused Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her at a booze-fueled summer party when they were high school students during the 1980s.
Kavanaugh has denied that account and has said he has never sexually assaulted anyone.
Read the letter:
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Strong' Legal Theory or 'Oxymoron'? Experts Eye FTC Antitrust Suit Against Mattress Merger
5 minute readTrump Campaign's Defamation Suit Against Washington Post Is Tossed by Judge
Trump Appeals Denial of Bid to Dismiss Lawsuit by U.S. Capitol Police Injured During Jan. 6 Breach
Trending Stories
- 1Republican Who Might Become FTC's Next Chair Blasts Democratic Commissioners' 'All Mergers Are Bad' Mindset
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: It's Bonus Time
- 3Maryland Atty Pushes Judge to Grant Discovery in Reverse Discrimination Suit Against King & Spalding
- 4Thompson Coburn Hit With Class Action Over Data Breach
- 5The Coming of Trump's Judicial Picks Spurs Liberals to Press for Biden's
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250