Legal Departments of the Year: Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc.
"Sometimes, in particular in meetings with other members of the C-suite or other senior business leaders, it can be helpful to 'forget' you are a lawyer for a little while and think of things from the perspective of a business person."
October 01, 2018 at 02:07 PM
4 minute read
|
Best Legal Department
Q: How is the role of general counsel evolving, and how have you adapted?
A: GCs more often are members of the C-suite, reporting in to the CEO. GCs' overall responsibilities have shifted and expanded from primarily legal matters, to much more of a business focus as well. GCs often have to weigh legal issues and risks against the long term business goals of the enterprise. From an Atlas perspective, I have been a part of this expansion of scope and responsibility, and it has been a very exciting time to be the company's general counsel. My role encompasses much more than the traditional legal role, and these responsibilities continue to grow in scope and impact. This includes being the company's corporate secretary, with primary responsibility to the board, governance and shareholders, and overseeing compliance, regulation, litigation, ethics, E&S (environmental and social) and beyond.
Q: How do you find it most effective to develop leadership skills, and to foster them in others?
A: Collaborating with other lawyers and business leaders in the company when leading projects provides a better overall perspective of the big picture and how to have a positive impact on it. Also delegating important matters to others, ensuring they have appropriate background, guidance and understanding from a legal and business perspective, and then letting them lead while providing an appropriate level of supervision. Atlas' culture encourages leadership interaction and outreach throughout the organization. Given the company's size and entrepreneurial spirit, the organization is not hierarchical in many ways. The company's leaders encourage collaboration, and they respect the legal and business views of the legal team. Lastly, remaining active with outside interests and opportunities that may help develop leadership skills
Q: What is the most effective time-management tool or technique you employ?
A: Companies often have many meetings, so a well-structured meeting is important. Having an agenda in advance, a summary of the items to be acted on in the meeting, and any “pre-read” materials are all very helpful. It's also useful to have the meeting begin with a big picture summary of the main topics/key items, and what folks are looking to achieve, rather than diving right into smaller issues or items. Communication is another key; avoid silos—if folks are kept in the loop it helps save time in the long run. And nothing gets done without a deadline—having deadlines assists in prioritizing and properly managing resources.
Q: What is your best advice for in-house lawyers trying to make an impact, with their corporate clients and beyond?
A: Always look to propose solutions, and not just identify the issues or impediments. It is important for others in the company to understand the legal issues, risks and the like, but also to understand what the “range of the possible” is. You don't want the Legal Department to be seen or behave as a department of “no” within the organization. By being collaborative and solutions-driven, and also providing an appropriate business perspective, other areas of the business should approach the legal team earlier in matters. And this can help make you a better and more well-rounded lawyer for the company.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readLegal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cars Reach Record Fuel Economy but Largely Fail to Meet Biden's EPA Standard, Agency Says
- 2How Cybercriminals Exploit Law Firms’ Holiday Vulnerabilities
- 3DOJ Asks 5th Circuit to Publish Opinion Upholding Gun Ban for Felon
- 4GEO Group Sued Over 2 Wrongful Deaths
- 5Revenue Up at Homegrown Texas Firms Through Q3, Though Demand Slipped Slightly
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250