Litigation Department of the Year - Class Action: Weil, Gotshal & Manges
We have the trial and courtroom expertise necessary to tackle any dispute, but we back it up with corporate governance, restructuring and financing experience that almost always comes into play in these situations.
October 03, 2018 at 04:15 PM
4 minute read
Q: What are some of the department's most satisfying successes of the past year and why?
A: Not more than three days after we submitted our response for this competition, David Lender and Eric Hochstadt and their team secured one of our biggest trial wins in recent memory—a complete defense jury verdict for C&S Wholesale Grocers in an antitrust class action in Minnesota federal court. This was a rare defense win in an antitrust class trial, where the exposure was significant because of the automatic trebling of any damages. We also had some high-profile victories for Signet Jewelers in an employment discrimination case that involves cutting-edge class arbitration issues, and for Showtime in a series of consumer class actions arising out of the Mayweather/McGregor boxing match.
Of particular note is Jonathan Polkes's and Caroline Zalka's eve-of-trial summary judgment win for Archstone and Lehman Brothers in a $4B investor class action in Colorado. This case emanated out of one of the largest REIT transactions in history, and involved proceedings in two Federal Circuit courts, two different state courts and three arbitrations. This win showcased the team approach we take to our most significant litigations. In addition, we have secured a number of victories for Farmers Insurance in an industry-wide MDL in Florida federal court involving auto body shop repair costs, and recently won a rare en banc rehearing before the Eleventh Circuit of a consolidated appeal of several component cases we defeated on motion.
Q: A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained. What is your answer?
A: We have the deepest bench in the business, one that includes top-tier talent and covers all disciplines that might be required. We have the trial and courtroom expertise necessary to tackle any dispute, but we back it up with corporate governance, restructuring and financing experience that almost always comes into play in these situations.
We've been through so many of these situations, so we know how to prioritize issues and focus on the necessary ones in a proactive way. We have developed these capabilities based in large part on our trial and litigation philosophy—one focused on obtaining the most efficient, business-oriented results.
Q: What traits do you respect most in opposing firms and lawyers?
A: Courtesy, professionalism, pragmatism and efficiency.
Q: What sorts of trends are you seeing in litigation, and what do you think will be the most important development in the law/legal business that will impact your field in the next 10 years?
A: Law firms will need to continue to focus on efficiencies as price sensitivity continues to become more pronounced. There also will continue to be significant competition for hiring the best talent.
We will continue to see a significant drop-off in the number of trials taken to verdict, and concurrently, a consolidation of the top-tier trial work among a smaller number of firms. The most important development to watch over the next decade is which firms are able to develop the next generation of top trial attorneys.
Q: What is the firm doing to ensure that future generations of litigators are ready to take the helm?
A: We have undertaken extensive efforts to promote and advance the next generation of leadership so that our junior partners are prepared not only to manage and try cases, but also to help run a large organization. One of the core elements of our efforts is assigning senior partners to mentor junior partners on all aspects of practice, but with particular focus on client management and development, leadership and profile-raising.
We also focus a lot on developing our next generation of trial lawyers in the courtroom. Critical to this is trial experience, and we have made great strides over the course of the past few years by originating opportunities for junior partners to second-chair, and in some cases first-chair, trials around the country.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBenjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
8 minute read'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 2Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 3Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
- 4Trump's DOJ Delays Releasing Jan. 6 FBI Agents List Under Consent Order
- 5Securities Report Says That 2024 Settlements Passed a Total of $5.2B
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250