Litigation Department of the Year - Class Action: Weil, Gotshal & Manges
We have the trial and courtroom expertise necessary to tackle any dispute, but we back it up with corporate governance, restructuring and financing experience that almost always comes into play in these situations.
October 03, 2018 at 04:15 PM
4 minute read
Q: What are some of the department's most satisfying successes of the past year and why?
A: Not more than three days after we submitted our response for this competition, David Lender and Eric Hochstadt and their team secured one of our biggest trial wins in recent memory—a complete defense jury verdict for C&S Wholesale Grocers in an antitrust class action in Minnesota federal court. This was a rare defense win in an antitrust class trial, where the exposure was significant because of the automatic trebling of any damages. We also had some high-profile victories for Signet Jewelers in an employment discrimination case that involves cutting-edge class arbitration issues, and for Showtime in a series of consumer class actions arising out of the Mayweather/McGregor boxing match.
Of particular note is Jonathan Polkes's and Caroline Zalka's eve-of-trial summary judgment win for Archstone and Lehman Brothers in a $4B investor class action in Colorado. This case emanated out of one of the largest REIT transactions in history, and involved proceedings in two Federal Circuit courts, two different state courts and three arbitrations. This win showcased the team approach we take to our most significant litigations. In addition, we have secured a number of victories for Farmers Insurance in an industry-wide MDL in Florida federal court involving auto body shop repair costs, and recently won a rare en banc rehearing before the Eleventh Circuit of a consolidated appeal of several component cases we defeated on motion.
Q: A prospective client in crisis calls and asks why your team should be retained. What is your answer?
A: We have the deepest bench in the business, one that includes top-tier talent and covers all disciplines that might be required. We have the trial and courtroom expertise necessary to tackle any dispute, but we back it up with corporate governance, restructuring and financing experience that almost always comes into play in these situations.
We've been through so many of these situations, so we know how to prioritize issues and focus on the necessary ones in a proactive way. We have developed these capabilities based in large part on our trial and litigation philosophy—one focused on obtaining the most efficient, business-oriented results.
Q: What traits do you respect most in opposing firms and lawyers?
A: Courtesy, professionalism, pragmatism and efficiency.
Q: What sorts of trends are you seeing in litigation, and what do you think will be the most important development in the law/legal business that will impact your field in the next 10 years?
A: Law firms will need to continue to focus on efficiencies as price sensitivity continues to become more pronounced. There also will continue to be significant competition for hiring the best talent.
We will continue to see a significant drop-off in the number of trials taken to verdict, and concurrently, a consolidation of the top-tier trial work among a smaller number of firms. The most important development to watch over the next decade is which firms are able to develop the next generation of top trial attorneys.
Q: What is the firm doing to ensure that future generations of litigators are ready to take the helm?
A: We have undertaken extensive efforts to promote and advance the next generation of leadership so that our junior partners are prepared not only to manage and try cases, but also to help run a large organization. One of the core elements of our efforts is assigning senior partners to mentor junior partners on all aspects of practice, but with particular focus on client management and development, leadership and profile-raising.
We also focus a lot on developing our next generation of trial lawyers in the courtroom. Critical to this is trial experience, and we have made great strides over the course of the past few years by originating opportunities for junior partners to second-chair, and in some cases first-chair, trials around the country.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readLegal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Cravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
- 2Kline & Specter Hit With Lawsuit From Another Former Associate
- 3USPTO Director Kathi Vidal Announces Resignation Ahead of Administration Change
- 4As Gen AI Acceptance Grows, Lawyers Race to Mitigate Risks
- 5Decisions Have 'Real-Life Consequences': Juvenile Court Judge Considered for Appellate Bench
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250