Distinguished Leader: Joseph Shenker
"First and foremost, to lead by example. Our firm chairs have historically continued as active practitioners of the quality we want each lawyer at the firm to aspire to and achieve."
October 04, 2018 at 03:10 PM
4 minute read
|
Joseph Shenker, Chairman, Sullivan & Cromwell
Q: What are some of your proudest recent achievements?
A: Being a “link in the chain” of leaders of Sullivan & Cromwell. Our history stretches back over nearly a century and a half, our lawyers are among the best in the world, our clients among the most respected and the matters on which they call upon us for advice among the most interesting and important. It has been, and continues to be, an incredible privilege to help lead this institution.
Q: What does it mean to be a leader?
A: First and foremost, to lead by example. Our firm chairs have historically continued as active practitioners of the quality we want each lawyer at the firm to aspire to and achieve. Second, to put the interest of the firm as a whole ahead of any personal interest or agenda: one cannot have “buy-in” to one's leadership and decision-making unless it is done in the best interest of the organization. Third, to keep an open mind and listen to divergent points of view and concerns, but then take action in the time frame that is most effective.
Q: Name a lawyer or mentor whose leadership inspired you.
A: I have learned much from each of my predecessors with whom I worked. John Merow was incredibly efficient and had an unerring ability to cut quickly to the heart of the matter with terrific business sense. Ricardo Mestres was one of the fairest and personal-agenda-less people I have ever met. Rodge Cohen's work ethic and devotion to his clients and the firm is nonpareil. Each of these leaders are obviously incredibly intellectually gifted, but that is something they cannot teach you; the other qualities can be taught.
Q: How are the business and profession of law changing, and how should lawyers adapt for the future?
A: Throughout my career there has always been more talk of the business and profession changing than it actually has, but I do believe the pace of change will pick up – largely as a result of ever increasing globalization, plus technological change and advances, on the part of our clients. The result I think is we will see more rapid bifurcation of providers of legal services into two groups. The first will consist of non-law firm legal service providers—ranging from online platforms and machine intelligence, to consulting firms, less expensive off shore providers and accounting firms—plus “mega-law firms” who aim to provide whatever legal service is required in whatever jurisdiction the client operates. The second group will be smaller and will I think consist of “boutique” or “specialty” firms of various sizes—including large ones—that focus on particular types of legal work, practice areas and/or jurisdictions. They too will be far more technologically advanced than today, but the lawyers in those firms to be successful will, I think, need to be nimble among practice areas, have broad areas of knowledge, and essentially serve as industry-based or client-based advisers on a whole range of legal topics, obviously with specialized knowledge on some topics and the ability to call upon others within their firm for specialized knowledge they lack.
Q: What is the best advice for someone considering a career in law, or someone already in the profession who is seeking to make a greater impact?
A: The broader your knowledge, within law and outside of it—whether economics, business, psychology, languages, knowledge of different cultures, etc.—the better; within the law, never “tune-out” when the specialist in an area you are less familiar with is speaking. Instead, seek to understand every aspect of a matter you are working on. And always remember the law is a noble profession: without a system or society based on laws none of us will prosper or fulfill our potential.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'A Regressive Institution': SDNY Judge Rakoff Delivers Pointed Remarks on SCOTUS in Recent Appearance
2 minute readFederal Court That Faces Its Share of Real-Life Horrors Gets Into Halloween Spirit
1 minute readLegal Aid Society Honors Milbank Attorney, Selendy Gay for Providing Pro Bono Firepower
2 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250