In Immigration Case Reversal, DOJ Drops Appeal to Pizza Delivery Man's Habeas Victory
The Ecuadorian immigrant was taken into custody by immigration officials in June, while attempting to delivery a pizza to the Fort Hamilton military facility in Brooklyn.
October 05, 2018 at 11:12 AM
3 minute read
In an abrupt about-face, federal prosecutors are rescinding a request to appeal the habeas corpus writ granted to Pablo Villavicencio, the pizza delivery man handed over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials after making a stop at the Brooklyn Fort Hamilton military facility in June.
The office of U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York alerted the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit early Friday that an agreement to withdraw the government's appeal, with prejudice. The two-line stipulation filed with the circuit provides no explanatory information about the government's motives or thinking behind withdrawing the appeal.
A spokesman for The Legal Aid Society, which is part of the team providing Villavicencio legal representation, said, “We are glad that today the Federal Government fully withdrew their challenge to Mr. Villavicencio's hard-won release from immigration detention and his opportunity to pursue lawful status. With Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, we will continue to represent Mr. Villavicencio, and work with him on securing status to remain in the United States with his family.”
The about-face represents a rare move by U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions' Justice Department, which has been, along with the Department of Homeland Security, the frontline enforcers of President Donald Trump's “zero tolerance” immigration policies.
A spokesman for the U.S. Department of Justice declined to comment on the decision.
The drop of the appeal will keep in place the habeas writ granted by U.S. District Judge Paul Crotty of the Southern District of New York in August. After referring to the Trump application of the administration's immigration policy as “thoughtless and cruel,” and the government's attempt to deport Villavicencio as a “mercurial exercise of executive power,” Crotty granted the writ, allowing Villavicencio to continue to pursue lawful residency status.
Crotty ordered ICE to release Villavicencio and halt deportation proceedings against him while he continues to pursue lawful residency status. That situation was thrown into uncertainty early in the week, when prosecutors from the office of U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman filed a notice of appeal with the Second Circuit.
Villavicencio's attorneys denounced the move at the time. On Friday, a spokeswoman for Berman's office declined to comment on the decision to reverse course.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250