Opposition to New Jails Complicates Plan for Closing Rikers Island
In four meetings held in recent weeks in each of the boroughs that would receive a new jail under the plan, officials from City Hall were confronted by residents who oppose construction of new jails, even in locations where jails already exist.
October 09, 2018 at 06:30 PM
4 minute read
As the New York City government proceeds with plans to replace the jail complex on Rikers Island with new facilities in four of the city's boroughs, officials have run into resistance from residents and government leaders from each borough over the proposed jail sites.
In four meetings held in recent weeks in each of the boroughs that would receive a new jail under the plan, officials from City Hall were confronted by residents who oppose construction of new jails, even in locations where jails already exist.
The city is aiming to have the new jails open and Rikers shuttered by 2027. The new jails would contain more than 1,500 beds and could come with amenities to serve surrounding communities, such as retail space or affordable housing.
In the Bronx, officials have proposed to build a new jail on what is now a New York City Police Department tow pound on a residential street in the Mott Haven section of the borough, which is in City Councilwoman Diana Ayala's district.
Ayala and council members who represent the districts in Brooklyn, Manhattan and Queens where the new jails would be built each expressed support for the proposals when they were unveiled in August.
The proposed jail for the Bronx would differ from the jails in the other three boroughs in that it would be built from scratch, rather than expanding and renovating existing facilities, and that it would not be in the vicinity of the borough's courthouses.
The proposal has also drawn criticism from a group of Bronx elected officials that includes Borough president Ruben Diaz Jr., who supports closing Rikers, but says that a new jail in the borough should be built closer to courthouses in the South Bronx.
“Presenting this site as a fait accompli has the potential to undermine necessary reforms to the criminal justice system,” Diaz said in a news release.
Opponents also include residents with not-in-my-backyard sentiments, those who don't think Rikers should be closed at all and activist groups like No New Jails NYC, which agrees that Rikers should close, but is against building new jails in the city, advocating for reducing the ranks of the incarcerated through reforms to the criminal justice system and divesting from mass incarceration.
“There is no such thing as a humane cage and new coats of paint can't make jails safe,” the group writes in an outline of its positions.
City leaders say that the total population of the incarcerated would need to be reduced to 5,000 for Rikers to close; thanks to various criminal justice system reforms, over the last two years, the population at Rikers has fallen from more than 9,700 to about 8,300, said Tyler Nims, executive director of the Independent Commission on New York City Criminal Justice and Incarceration Reform, which issued the report recommending gradually closing down the scandal-plagued jail facility on Rikers over a 10-year period.
Nims said that it came as no surprise that the sites for the borough-based jails would get some pushback from residents, but said he doesn't think the jails as proposed would negatively affect the character of their respective neighborhoods.
Nims said the city plans to get the Uniform Land Use Review Process, which includes review by elected officials and the City Planning Commission, rolling by the end of the year and there may not be enough time to look for new sites.
Additionally, he said, for proponents of closing Rikers, it is important to keep up the momentum of the process to ensure that it can be completed within the next nine years.
“We are in the midst I think of changing the way that justice is done in this city,” Nims said.
Read more:
NYC Settles With US Attorney's Office Over Disability Accommodations at Rikers
NYC Announces 4 New Borough-Based Jails in Anticipation of Rikers Closure
NYC DAs Sharply Divided on Proposal to Close Rikers Island
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSo Who Won? Congestion Pricing Ruling Leaves Both Sides Claiming Victory, Attorneys Seeking Clarification
4 minute readHochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
Court System Names New Administrative Judges for New York City Courts in Leadership Shakeup
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Many LA County Law Firms Remain Open, Mobilize to Support Affected Employees Amid Historic Firestorm
- 2Stevens & Lee Names New Delaware Shareholder
- 3U.S. Supreme Court Denies Trump Effort to Halt Sentencing
- 4From CLO to President: Kevin Boon Takes the Helm at Mysten Labs
- 5How Law Schools Fared on California's July 2024 Bar Exam
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250