Brad Karp Rallies NY Legal Community in Acceptance Speech
Editor's Note: This is the speech Paul, Weiss Chairman Brad Karp gave when he accepted the Attorney of the Year award from the New York Law Journal…
October 11, 2018 at 06:29 PM
6 minute read
Editor's Note: This is the speech Paul, Weiss Chairman Brad Karp gave when he accepted the Attorney of the Year award from the New York Law Journal Wednesday night.
I want to thank the NYLJ for this wonderful honor and tribute. I am very grateful and humbled.
I work in a town with nearly 200,000 supremely talented lawyers—each of whom, each and every day, makes enormous contributions to their clients, their communities and the institutions that make our city the very best in the world.
We're all so blessed and privileged to be able to do what we do for a living and to be a member of the most talented, sophisticated and committed bar anywhere.
So this honor carries special meaning for me.
I am particularly honored to have been considered for this award along with Stanley Brown of Hogan and Bill Carmody of Susman Godfrey, two of the finest, most formidable, and most decent lawyers I know.
And receiving an award from the New York Law Journal brings back a flood of nostalgic, personal memories.
I grew up in a home in Long Island, where my mom and dad were both litigators and worked together at their own Manhattan-based law firm, Karp & Karp. To me, Karp & Karp felt like Cravath. I revered my parents and I was fascinated by their cases and viscerally recall the passion and respect they had for the law.
In my house, we subscribed to two daily newspapers, The New York Times and the New York Law Journal. As a child, I read both the Times and the Law Journal every day.
When I joined Paul, Weiss as an associate on October 21, 1985, I received three assignments my first day—one of which was to write a monthly column for the Law Journal, titled “Second Circuit Review.” The column, which had not previously existed, would analyze developments in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where I had just completed a clerkship. I was told that a different Paul, Weiss lawyer would be responsible for drafting each month's column.
Well, that didn't quite turn out to be the case. My first column appeared on November 19, 1985. My 396th column will appear on October 24th—and, God willing, my 500th column will appear on February 24, 2027.
So the Law Journal holds a special place in my personal and professional life.
I've been blessed professionally to have been mentored by two of the most gifted and committed lawyers of the past century—and, I would argue, the two finest litigators ever.
I'm referring to Judge Simon Rifkind, who created the modern litigation practice when he joined Paul, Weiss in 1950, after having served for more than a decade as an acclaimed federal district judge in the Southern District of New York, and the legendary Arthur Liman, who led Paul, Weiss during the 1970's, '80s and '90s.
The Judge and Arthur were both role models to me and embodied the very best of our profession. They were brilliant litigators, trial lawyers and corporate advisers.
But what truly distinguished them is that they both believed passionately in the concept of public service and pro bono work. They saw the law as a noble “profession,” not as a commercial enterprise.
They viewed community engagement and pro bono service to be indispensable elements of the private practice of law—and every bit as important as work for paying clients.
And they lived these ideals every day. And inculcated everyone at Paul, Weiss with their belief that the law was a noble profession and that giving back to the community is an essential part of what it means to be a lawyer.
Their DNA continues to exist in the hallways of Paul, Weiss and in the heart and soul of every Paul, Weiss lawyer—and continues to define what the Paul, Weiss law firm is all about.
It is such a privilege to lead a law firm whose professionals are wholly committed—reflexively committed—to doing the right thing, the courageous thing.
A law firm that is willing to stand up for the rule of law.
A firm that is willing to fight, tooth and nail, to protect individual liberties.
A law firm that courageously stepped into Brown v. Board of Education, to end segregation in our nation's public schools.
A law firm that courageously established the principle of “one-person, one-vote,” which undoubtedly will be tested once again on November 6th.
A law firm that courageously represented Edith Windsor in the Supreme Court to establish the constitutional right to same-sex marriage.
Unfortunately, we are confronted today with crises of unimaginable enormity—crises that threaten the rule of law, crises that endanger individual liberties, crises that imperil the very fabric of our society.
I have been able to activate Paul, Weiss at all levels—from our senior-most partner to our junior-most paralegal—to join me in our crucial fight for justice.
I am proud that Paul, Weiss has played a leadership role in addressing the family separation crisis and the continuing assault by government authorities on vulnerable immigrant groups; in seeking to end the gun violence epidemic and responding to the drumbeat of mass shootings at Parkland, Las Vegas and Orlando; in blocking threats to defund the Legal Services Corporation; in fighting efforts to disenfranchise millions of voters; and in resisting attempts to eliminate a woman's reproductive freedom. The list of freedoms and liberties under assault, tragically, goes on and on.
I am proud that we have answered this call to justice with unprecedented urgency and unprecedented resources.
And I am proud that so many of my peer firms, across the New York and broader legal community, likewise have answered the call.
This level of collaboration among the private bar has not been seen for generations, since the civil rights movement of the 1960's.
When all is said and done, I firmly believe that the private bar will be lauded for banding together to protect our justice system and to preserve our most sacred liberties and rights.
It is on behalf of my colleagues at Paul, Weiss—and all of my colleagues in our profession who strive to do what is right and just each and every day—that I accept this award.
The name partners of Karp & Karp, who passed away long ago, would have been so proud of this honor.
And for that, I thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250