Former Attorneys to Rick Gates Sue for $368K in Unpaid Bills Related to Mueller Charges
Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack was allowed to withdraw from Gates' criminal case in February after claiming irreconcilable differences with its client.
October 11, 2018 at 03:24 PM
3 minute read
Attorneys who represented Richard “Rick” Gates, the former Trump campaign official who testified for the government against his former boss Paul Manafort, have sued in Manhattan federal court over his failure to pay legal bills incurred before attorneys and client parted ways in February.
In a U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York filing late Wednesday, Doar Rieck Kaley & Mack claim Gates has so far stiffed it on more than $368,000 for legal services rendered defending him in the criminal action brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller's office.
In February, firm name attorney Walter Mack sought to be removed as Gates' counsel, citing irreconcilable differences. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the District of Columbia approved the move. Shortly after, Gates, through his new counsel, Sidley Austin senior counsel Thomas Green, pleaded guilty to fraud-related charges and entered into a cooperation agreement with the government.
Green did not respond to a request for comment.
According to Doar Rieck's counsel in the suit, private attorney Joel A. Siegel, the firm submitted an invoice in September based on a previous retainer agreement signed by the parties. Gates has never disputed or expressed dissatisfaction with the services rendered, according to the complaint.
So far Gates has paid $20,000 of the original $388,525.34 invoice, resulting in the current balance. Despite demands made on Gates to pay the remainder, the complaint claims Gates “has failed and refused to pay the amount due and owing.”
Gates' legal finance concerns have colored his dealings with Mueller's office. Shortly after charges were filed, Berman reprimanded Gates for appearing in a pretaped video played at a fundraising event for his legal costs, despite the presence of a gag order in the case.
Additionally, according to the Wall Street Journal, a former lawyer for Trump attempted at one point to divert money from the White House's legal defense fund for the Mueller probe to help Gates and Manafort. The attorney, John Dowd, was blocked by Trump aides concerned the move and a pledge of $25,000 of his own money could be seen as interfering with the investigation.
Despite the high-profile context around the suit against Gates, Siegel told the New York Law Journal the suit was a straightforward one.
“It's a garden-variety failure to pay for services rendered,” Siegel said. “I understand it was a high-profile case, but it boils down to something mundane.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readCleary Creates Nonequity Partner Tier, Calling for 'Innovation and Adaptation'
5 minute readUS Judge Sets May Trial Date for Sean Combs as Defense Fends Off 'Damning' Tape
200 Hrs. of Partner Prep Guides Quinn Emanuel's Incredibly Detailed Mock Bankruptcy Trial
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250