Boies Schiller Cleared to Keep Billionaire Ex-Client's File Amid Fee Dispute
With a New York state court ruling on Friday, Boies Schiller can continue hanging onto a discovery file that serves as leverage while the firm tries to recover more than $825,000 in unpaid fees from a billionaire former client.
October 12, 2018 at 02:52 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
A New York state judge sided on Friday with Boies Schiller Flexner, declining to force the firm to turn over discovery documents to a former client, Russian-Canadian billionaire Alex Shnaider, who owes the firm a little shy of $1 million in legal fees.
Shnaider, now represented by Kasowitz Benson Torres, had submitted a petition in Manhattan state court on Wednesday looking for a temporary restraining order, and later an injunction. Shnaider's petition effectively asked the court to order the return of his client file in an underlying lawsuit in New York federal court, which pits the billionaire against his former business partner in a venture to sell private jets.
A Boies Schiller team led by partners Nicholas Gravante Jr. and Karen Dyer had been defending Shnaider in the jet litigation for more than two years. But, in late August, the firm asked to withdraw from the case, citing “irreconcilable differences with Mr. Shnaider regarding the payment of BSF's legal fees.”
At a hearing in Manhattan on Friday, Gravante told New York Supreme Court Justice Debra James that Shnaider owes Boies Schiller some $825,000 plus interest. In light of the unpaid fees, the firm has asserted a retaining lien on Shnaider's client file that includes discovery material from the jet lawsuit. Otherwise, Gravante said, “the likelihood that we will recover our fees is almost nil.”
A trial is scheduled in the jet case for early December. The Kasowitz lawyers—who represent Shnaider in the underlying federal lawsuit and in the state court proceedings against Boies Schiller—have argued that with less than two months to go before that trial, Shnaider won't be able to adequately mount a defense without the client file from Boies Schiller.
Kasowitz associate Michael Beck, who was in court representing Shnaider, told James that the file includes documents compiled in response to interrogatory requests and other discovery material. Not having access to the file, he said, deprives Shnaider's legal team of important information relevant to his defense.
“We'll go into this essentially blind,” Beck said.
Earlier in the hearing, James asked the two sides if they had discussed any sort of deal that might resolve the issue.
In response, Gravante said Boies Schiller would be willing to hand over the client file if Shnaider and his lawyers agreed to put the money he owes into an escrow account until the fee dispute is fully resolved. But Beck said his client wasn't willing to make that kind of deal at this point.
The judge ultimately sided with Boies Schiller. James denied Shnaider's request for a temporary restraining order, reasoning, in part, that such an order would typically be handed down to “maintain the status quo.” Here, however, Shnaider was looking for more than that, she said.
The decision was not a final resolution. The judge went on to set some additional deadlines—Boies Schiller would have until Oct. 23 to file a response opposing Shnaider's petition and, if necessary, Shnaider could reply to that by Oct. 26. Another hearing was set for Oct. 29.
But James also indicated that she'd rather not have to hold further proceedings, imploring the two sides to resolve their dispute beforehand.
“I'd really urge the parties to craft some sort of compromise,” the judge said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Denies Retrial Bid by Ex-U.S. Sen. Menendez Over Evidentiary Error
What Businesses Need to Know About Anticipated FTC Leadership Changes
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250