In an Effort to Be the Premier Court in the World, NY Is Investing in the Commercial Division
"We are committed to taking the fullest advantage of technology to help us adjudicate the challenging disputes that 21st-century litigation can present," said Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks.
October 22, 2018 at 02:21 PM
4 minute read
New York courts want to be the go-to venue for settling international disputes, and officials are investing in whizbang technology that has the potential to transform commercial trials.
The technology debuted in state Supreme Court Justice Saliann Scarpulla's courtroom, Room 208 at 60 Centre St., this month. Scarpulla, who is tech-savvy, is helping the Office of Court Administration work out the kinks before other courtrooms are upgraded.
“We are committed to taking the fullest advantage of technology to help us adjudicate the challenging disputes that 21st-century litigation can present,” said Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Marks. “This is particularly true for complex commercial litigation. But it is also true for other categories of cases, including Family Court matters as well as a range of other types of litigation, civil and criminal.”
Bringing the most up-to-date technology to a courthouse built in 1927 and whose facade is synonymous with the widely popular TV series “Law and Order” presented challenges. The building, which is owned by New York City, is protected by landmark status and the court system is required to preserve its intricate woodwork, beautiful artwork and historic elements.
“It needs to reflect both the rich and deep history of the law in New York state but also reflect the current philosophy of making litigation more user-friendly, less expensive and more efficient,” Scarpulla said.
At a cost of $40,000, the courtroom was outfitted with an 86-inch screen to display documents, a podium with a document viewer and a USB port and smaller screens for the attorneys and the judge. The jury box was expanded to make room for a wheelchair, and jurors with difficulty hearing or seeing are able to serve with technological assistance.
“Touching the screen or using a stylus on the screen, the 86-inch screen is set so that the attorneys can highlight info on the screen, mark up documents and save them as marked-up documents or let the markup go,” Scarpulla said. “We have laptops that the attorneys provide and we bring up the flash drive to the jury so they're not inundated with giant boxloads of documents. So we can promise a juror that they're not going to be here for six months looking through documents.”
The attorneys have the option of connecting their personal laptops so they don't need notes and there is software that hooks into the large screen so that an attorney can attend a conference by Skype. An attorney at the podium can scan any document not on the flash drive at the last minute. There is a separate USB port if the attorneys feel their documents are too confidential for the court's Wi-Fi.
“It's much cheaper and smarter to bring a flash drive into court than to hire three or four people to bring in 30 or 40 boxes of documents, which has happened in my courtroom,” she said. “Three people were needed to bring the documents in and one or two people to go through them and pull out documents as needed during the trial.”
Recently, Scarpulla spoke to about 80 commercial judges from the around the world at an international forum in the Southern District of New York. She said none had the amenities available in courtroom 208.
“We think it's important to have the right technology to give the business community in New York the sense that we could compete with the best courts in the world,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPatent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trade Fixtures in New York Eminent Domain Cases—What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readAttorneys ‘On the Move’: Morrison Cohen Adds White Collar Partner; Corporate/Securities Partner Joins Olshan
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250