SI Dems Fight to Keep Two Judicial Candidates on Ballot in Wake of Botched Filing
A panel from the Appellate Division, Second Department issued a unanimous ruling to kick judicial candidates Anthony Catalano and Orlando Marrazzo Jr. off the Democratic Party line, reversing a ruling by Staten Island Supreme Court Justice Alan Marin.
October 22, 2018 at 05:19 PM
3 minute read
The Staten Island Democratic Party is fighting a court ruling that kicked two of its candidates for the state Supreme Court off the Nov. 6 ballot for running afoul of election laws by failing to turn in the formal minutes from the party's nominating convention without explanation.
Last week, a panel from the Appellate Division, Second Department issued a unanimous ruling to kick judicial candidates Anthony Catalano and Orlando Marrazzo Jr. off the Democratic Party line, reversing a ruling by Staten Island Supreme Court Justice Alan Marin.
The four-judge panel acknowledged that while the party did submit a verbatim transcript of the Sept. 20 nominating convention to the New York City Board of Elections and that the stenographer who wrote it up attested to its accuracy, neither the party chair nor the secretary certified the transcript.
Additionally, the panel said, the party failed to submit certified minutes of the convention, which is required by statute, and has made no attempts to rectify the issue or explain why the minutes weren't filed.
Courts have found that failing to file the convention minutes is not a “fatal defect” per se, the panel found, but any delay in filing the minutes should be brief.
“This failure is inexplicable given that the convention chair read to the delegates, at the outset of the convention, an authorization letter from the party's state chair which expressly stated that the Election Law requires that within 72 hours of the adjournment of the convention, the duly certified minutes must be filed with the Board of Elections,” the panel wrote.
Justices Alan Scheinkman, Mark Dillon, Valerie Brathwaite Nelson and Angela Iannacci joined on the decision.
The Second Department will hear the party's motion for leave to appeal the ruling to the state Court of Appeals on Wednesday, said elections lawyer Martin Connor, who is representing the party in the matter. The court will likely render a decision on the motion on the same day, he said.
If the Second Department's ruling stands, Catalano, Staten Island's public administrator, would be booted off the ballot entirely. Marrazzo, however, will still appear on the ballot on the Reform Party line.
Catalano became a judicial candidate for state Supreme Court this year after losing a Democratic primary fight for Surrogate's Court judge to Assemblyman Matthew Titone.
Brendan Lantry, an attorney with the Staten Island-based Menicucci Villa Cilmi who chairs the Staten Island Republican Party, said the issues affecting the Democratic Party have not affected the GOP's strategy for getting U.S. Rep. Daniel Donovan re-elected and getting State Assemblyman Ron Castorina elected as a Surrogate's Court judge.
“The decision by the Second Department doesn't change in any way the plan for the Staten Island Republicans,” Lantry said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1How to Support Law Firm Profitability: Train Partners Up
- 2Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 3Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 4Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 5X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250