2nd Circuit Won't Pause Proceedings in Census Litigation
The three-judge panel delivered a brief order late Friday, denying the request by DOJ attorneys to have the proceedings before U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman put on hold.
October 26, 2018 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
A federal appellate court refused late Friday to stay the proceedings in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's push to put a question about citizenship status on the 2020 U.S. Census.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a Department of Justice request to stay the proceedings before U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York. The panel of Judges John Walker Jr. and Raymond Lohier Jr., with U.S. District Judge William Pauley III of the Southern District of New York sitting by designation, denied the request in a two-sentence order.
No reasoning for denying the stay request was given. The government had requested the stay pending resolution of its forthcoming petition for a writ of mandamus or certiorari in the Supreme Court.
A DOJ spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The denial of the government's petition comes just hours after Furman himself denied a similar stay requested by the government, which he noted had “remarkably” been done simultaneously with the request submitted to the circuit panel. Citing the government's own stated urgent need for resolution in the matter, he declined to stay proceedings ahead of the trial start in early November.
The Trump administration had not demonstrated irreparable harm in its motion to stay proceedings, Furman said in his ruling. He added that any delay in the trial would impede the work of the U.S. Census Bureau, which is scheduled to finalize the census questionnaire by late spring.
“In short, as prudent as it might be under other circumstances to await further guidance from the Supreme Court, there are good reasons not to do so here and instead to proceed to trial as scheduled. Time is of the essence,” Furman wrote. “Defendants suffer no substantive, cognizable harm whatsoever in proceeding to trial as scheduled.”
In a statement, a spokeswoman for the New York State Attorney General's Office, which is leading a coalition of states in the underlying lawsuit, said in a statement that attorneys for the federal government were “flouting the basic structure of our judicial system” by “jumping to the Second Circuit before the district court even weighed in on their last motion.”
“Given DOJ's extensive and absurd attempts to block this case, you really have to wonder what they're trying to hide. We won't back down from fighting for a full and fair census,” the spokeswoman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute read'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250