2nd Circuit Won't Pause Proceedings in Census Litigation
The three-judge panel delivered a brief order late Friday, denying the request by DOJ attorneys to have the proceedings before U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman put on hold.
October 26, 2018 at 06:00 PM
3 minute read
A federal appellate court refused late Friday to stay the proceedings in a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's push to put a question about citizenship status on the 2020 U.S. Census.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied a Department of Justice request to stay the proceedings before U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York. The panel of Judges John Walker Jr. and Raymond Lohier Jr., with U.S. District Judge William Pauley III of the Southern District of New York sitting by designation, denied the request in a two-sentence order.
No reasoning for denying the stay request was given. The government had requested the stay pending resolution of its forthcoming petition for a writ of mandamus or certiorari in the Supreme Court.
A DOJ spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The denial of the government's petition comes just hours after Furman himself denied a similar stay requested by the government, which he noted had “remarkably” been done simultaneously with the request submitted to the circuit panel. Citing the government's own stated urgent need for resolution in the matter, he declined to stay proceedings ahead of the trial start in early November.
The Trump administration had not demonstrated irreparable harm in its motion to stay proceedings, Furman said in his ruling. He added that any delay in the trial would impede the work of the U.S. Census Bureau, which is scheduled to finalize the census questionnaire by late spring.
“In short, as prudent as it might be under other circumstances to await further guidance from the Supreme Court, there are good reasons not to do so here and instead to proceed to trial as scheduled. Time is of the essence,” Furman wrote. “Defendants suffer no substantive, cognizable harm whatsoever in proceeding to trial as scheduled.”
In a statement, a spokeswoman for the New York State Attorney General's Office, which is leading a coalition of states in the underlying lawsuit, said in a statement that attorneys for the federal government were “flouting the basic structure of our judicial system” by “jumping to the Second Circuit before the district court even weighed in on their last motion.”
“Given DOJ's extensive and absurd attempts to block this case, you really have to wonder what they're trying to hide. We won't back down from fighting for a full and fair census,” the spokeswoman said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLisa Zornberg, Former Adams Chief Counsel, Moves to Morvillo Abramowitz
5 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250