NewsHour Writer, Allegedly Fired in Wake of Remark, Files Sex Bias Suit Against Public TV Station
PBS Weekend NewsHour news writer Hugh Heckman claims the public television station failed to conduct an investigation, and provided conflicting reasons for his termination after he was fired in the wake of alleged remarks he made about Meghan Markle in the workplace.
October 26, 2018 at 03:49 PM
4 minute read
Veteran television news writer Hugh Heckman had been working for the PBS NewsHour Weekend out of WNET in New York for two years. Like many other workers in the news media, he was working on a story on the upcoming British royal wedding between Prince Henry and his then-fiancée Meghan Markle.
According to Heckman, he made an innocuous remark about the Duchess of Sussex—“not bad”—to a fellow male co-worker. The remark, he claims in a new federal lawsuit, was meant “to convey that the duchess possessed charm and beauty and was a suitable match for her fiancé, who has a reputation of possessing charm and handsome looks.”
A female co-worker sitting more than 20 feet away heard the remark and criticized Heckman for going against the recent training employees at the station had had regarding sexual harassment, according to the complaint. Another co-worker joined in, asking, “haven't you learned,” the complaint said.
The first co-worker made a complaint to Scott Davis, executive producer of WNET's NewsHour. According to the filing in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, WNET did not conduct an investigation into the situation, and Heckman was not given a chance to speak with anyone about the allegations.
Two days after the incident—despite what the plaintiff claims was Davis' previous efforts to keep Heckman as part of the program's team—Heckman says Davis contacted him and told him he was firing him over “this latest incident.”
Heckman says he informed Davis that the same two female employees had themselves behaved similarly, referring to a picture of Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau whom they called “hot.” Yet no actions were taken against them, according to the complaint.
The complaint states that the back-office contractor that handles taxes and record-keeping for WNET claimed that Heckman was terminated largely because his services were no longer needed, but Heckman alleges he faced employment discrimination on the basis of his sex. The lawsuit was filed after he was granted a right to sue by the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, after he filed a Title VII complaint.
In an emailed statement, WNET chief marketing and engagement officer Kellie Castruita Specter said Heckman was a part-time employee terminated in November 2017, and added that the station does not comment on pending litigation.
Heckman is represented by private attorney Jillian Weiss, the former executive director of the Transgender Legal Defense & Education Fund. As her Twitter biography notes, her practice largely focuses on protecting LGBTQ employees in the courts. Yet Weiss told the New York Law Journal that she was willing to represent clients “outside of the community when appropriate.”
Heckman's case is just such a situation, according to Weiss.
“Cases that do not merit the kind of weight that I see in the other cases that I bring dilute and diminish the force of many legitimate cases, and gives rise to those who oppose discrimination law to conclude all discrimination cases are frivolous,” Weiss said.
In Heckman's dismissal, Weiss took specific issue with the reasons given that appeared to run counter to the series of events. For Weiss, the kind of failure to investigate and provide legitimate reasons for removal ascribed to WNET in the complaint are of a kind she says she's familiar with. Her LGBTQ clients often allege they, too, find no proper investigation is done, forcing them to deal with the effects of discrimination.
Weiss acknowledged that Heckman faced other previous issues at WNET, but said that none of the other incidents were of a kind for which he claims he was discriminatorily fired.
“Because the employer has raised a defense that the reason for the dismissal was simply that his services were no longer needed, I wanted to make it clear that they did in fact invoke reasoning based on performance issues,” she said. “None of them merit this kind of action, and they are simply a post hoc justification.”
Heckman makes three claims, one under the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, and two under New York's human rights law.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
The American Disabilities Act, Sovereign Immunity and Individual Liability
7 minute readGE Agrees to $362.5M Deal to End Shareholder Claims Over Power, Insurance Risks
2 minute readJudge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250