NY DAs Ask Cuomo to Fund More Videotaped Interrogations, Body Cameras
“There is no doubt that the everyday work of prosecutors is an integral part of maintaining and improving the quality of life for all New Yorkers," DAASNY president David Soares said.
October 26, 2018 at 02:02 PM
6 minute read
The state's district attorneys asked Gov. Andrew Cuomo in a new letter to include more funding in his executive budget proposal to provide continuing legal education for prosecutors, more body-worn cameras for police agencies statewide, and more money for counties to reimburse their salaries.
Albany County District Attorney David Soares, president of the District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, highlighted the state's lower crime rate over the past decade in a laundry list of requests sent to Cuomo this week.
“New York has the lowest crime rate of any large state. New York also has the lowest imprisonment rate of any large state. Since 2007 crime has declined by 18 percent in New York state,” Soares wrote. “There is no doubt that the everyday work of prosecutors is an integral part of maintaining and improving the quality of life for all New Yorkers.”
The snag, Soares said, is that many of the offices of district attorneys are underfunded and understaffed in New York. DAASNY asked Cuomo to put more money in the budget to support their priorities, of which there are many.
The group recommended that Cuomo include more funding for technology that police agencies and prosecutors would use to improve transparency both during an arrest and when an individual is in custody. That includes videotaped interrogations. DAASNY supports the practice, but it doesn't come cheap, Soares said in the letter.
“While embracing this technology, district attorneys are now experiencing first-hand the ongoing costs that come with using this technology, such as transcription, translation, photocopying, storage, presentation software for courtroom use, and equipment maintenance and replacement,” Soares wrote. “Investment in video recording of interrogations is money well spent; it directly contributes to a fair, strong and transparent criminal justice system.”
DAASNY recommended that Cuomo include $500,000 in additional funding for police departments to develop and maintain video recording locations. They also recommended another $500,000 be allocated to district attorneys to purchase equipment, arrange storage, transcribe the footage, and train staff, among other costs.
Many of the same costs are associated with purchasing and maintaining body-worn cameras at police agencies. Storage costs for the video can range from $100 to $1,000 every month, Soares said. The cameras themselves cost, on average, $1,000 per device, according to the letter. Many police agencies don't have the funds to support that kind of investment, which would be an ongoing cost, Soares said.
“Without significant state funding, once police begin routinely wearing recording devices district attorneys will have to deal with the ongoing costs that come with using this technology,” Soares wrote. “Obligations associated with these recordings include reviewing, redacting, transcribing, translating and disclosing thousands of hours of recordings.”
The group recommended that Cuomo include $1.5 million to equip police officers with body cameras and allow prosecutors to handle the footage. The latter cost has yet to be established, Soares said, so DAASNY recommended that Cuomo and state lawmakers revisit the funding each year to ensure the resources are there to support the technology.
Prosecutors also have to be trained on how to manage the technology, which is where the continuing legal education costs come in. DAASNY asked Cuomo to include $2.75 million in funding for the New York Prosecutors Training Institute, which would be an increase of more than $400,000 over last year.
The institute provides training to prosecutors on several topics, like ethics and technology, but it also offers a handful of services to district attorneys. It helps with research and drafting motions and appeals, for example, especially for counties with fewer than 10 assistant district attorneys, according to the letter.
“NYPTI spurs information sharing and collaboration among prosecutors, and between prosecutors and other criminal justice agencies in order to promote problem-solving—all while maximizing scarce resources,” Soares wrote.
Speaking of scarce resources, Soares also wrote that counties have been unable to pay some district attorneys their full salary after state law increased it earlier this year. Statute requires that a district attorney's salary match the County Court judge or Supreme Court judge in a county depending on the population of that county, Soares wrote. The salary of Supreme Court judges increased to $208,000 earlier this year after a state commission voted to raise it in 2015.
“Cash-strapped counties were reluctant to pay for that unfunded mandate,” Soares wrote. “As a result, not all district attorneys are being paid what the law requires them to be paid for their services and they are in a political quandary if they demand what is rightfully owed to them by statute.”
DAASNY recommended that Cuomo include an additional $2 million in his budget to cover the salary increase, which would bring the total funding reimbursement to counties for salaries to $6.2 million in the next fiscal year.
Soares also wrote about a number of other priorities for prosecutors over the next year. DAASNY recommended that Cuomo include more funding to combat gun violence, the opioid epidemic, Medicaid fraud, tax fraud and motor vehicle theft.
They also recommended continued funding for loan forgiveness programs for prosecutors and public defenders, as well as funding to recruit and retain prosecutors who already have experience and training.
Cuomo will deliver his executive budget proposal in January and negotiate with lawmakers on a final state budget until its due at the end of March. A spokesman for Cuomo did not immediately comment on DAASNY's letter Friday.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorneys 'On the Move': Structured Finance Attorney Joins Hunton Andrews Kurth; Foley Adds IP Partner
4 minute readNY Civil Liberties Legal Director Stepping Down After Lengthy Tenure
Former Top Aide to NYC Mayor Is Charged With Bribery Conspiracy
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250