NY Lawyer Disbarred After Admitting Role in Stock Scheme
Darren Ofsink was one of a number of people indicted in 2015 over a so-called "pump-and-dump" scheme. His guilty plea to a conspiracy charge last year triggered an automatic disbarment.
October 29, 2018 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
A New York lawyer who pleaded guilty last year to taking part in an $86 million pump-and-dump stock manipulation scheme has now been disbarred after a ruling from the New York Appellate Division, First Department.
The lawyer, Darren Ofsink of Merrick, New York, formerly headed a four-lawyer firm called Ofsink LLC in Manhattan. He was indicted in 2015 along with a pair of registered securities brokers as part of a criminal case that also targeted several other co-defendants. The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of New York accused Ofsink and the others of engineering a reverse merger that turned CodeSmart Holdings Inc. into a publicly traded company and then manipulating CodeSmart's stock value.
“After gaining control of CodeSmart's 3 million purportedly unrestricted shares, the co-conspirators on two occasions fraudulently inflated CodeSmart's share price and trading volume and then sold their shares at a profit when the price reached desirable levels,” the U.S. Attorney's Office said in an October 2017 statement.
At a high point in July 2013, CodeSmart traded at $6.94 a share—valuing the company at more than $86 million, according to prosecutors. The same day, however, CodeSmart submitted a regulatory filing listing $7,600 in revenue and net losses of more than $103,000. By December 2013, the company's stock was trading at $0.01 per share.
Ofsink pleaded guilty on Oct. 18, 2017, to one count of conspiring to commit securities fraud. As part of the plea, he admitted to defrauding more than 10 victims and raking in some $292,409 in illicit profits from the stock manipulation scheme. A sentencing hearing has yet to be scheduled, according to court records.
In its disciplinary ruling, issued on Thursday, the First Department found that Ofsink's guilty plea to the crime triggered an automatic disbarment under New York judiciary law, retroactive to the date last year when Ofsink entered his plea. The ruling also notes that Ofsink “accepts full responsibility” and has expressed “remorse and contrition” for his conduct.
Contacted for comment on Monday, a defense lawyer for Ofsink in the criminal case, Christopher Bruno of Bruno & Degenhardt, referenced a letter that Ofsink sent to disciplinary authorities in New York. Ofsink indicated in the letter that he would not oppose his name being struck from the attorney rolls in the state.
“In the letter he also apologized for his conduct,” Bruno said. Ofsink represented himself in the disciplinary case.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
Trending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
