Hudson Valley Credit Union Settles DOJ Investigation Into Vet Vehicle Repossessions
According to the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office, the credit union ran afoul of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which prohibits seizures of active-duty military members' vehicles without a court order.
November 02, 2018 at 03:26 PM
4 minute read
The Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union has settled legal action taken against it by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Manhattan over allegations of the bank's illegal repossession of active-duty military members' vehicles.
The Poughkeepsie-based bank acknowledged the settlement in an email sent by a spokeswoman. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, it has agreed to pay $30,000 to the federal government to settle the claims, while not admitting liability. An additional $65,000 will go to compensate service members whose cars were seized, federal prosecutors said.
“Protecting service members is a high priority for this office and the country. We are pleased that Hudson Valley has taken these remedial steps, and this office will continue to protect the rights of men and women in uniform,” U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman of the Southern District of New York said in a statement.
In a complaint filed by the office on Friday, federal prosecutors claimed a pattern and practice of the bank repossessing vehicles in violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, which requires lenders to secure court orders before repossessing the vehicles of active-duty service members.
Federal prosecutors claimed in a court filing Friday that the bank repossessed at least nine vehicles between 2008 and 2014, despite protections. No policy to guard against such violations was in place at HVFCU until August 2014, the U.S. Attorney's Office claimed.
The U.S. Attorney's Office pointed to two service member suits that claimed the credit union seized their vehicles, despite qualifying for protection under the SCRA.
The bank failed to run a check through a federal database of active-duty status for members, the U.S. Attorney's Office claimed. The lawsuits alleged that, not only was their service status not checked, the bank rejected requests for SCRA protection. In one instance, a service member stationed in South Korea tried multiple times to notify the credit union that he was on active duty, yet his car was still repossessed.
Of the nine service members who lost their vehicles to repossession, four of them are still on active duty, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
In its statement, the bank said that only seven instances were ultimately identified by federal prosecutors. According to the U.S. Attorney's Office, the agreement requires Hudson Valley to provide $10,000 in compensation to each of the six affected service members, plus any lost equity in the vehicle with interest. An additional service member, whose vehicle was repossessed but returned within 24 hours, will receive $5,000, and Hudson Valley has also taken steps to repair the credit of the affected service members, federal authorities said.
“The men and women of our military deserve our unwavering support so when we learned of the DOJ's inquiry in 2016, we immediately reviewed our procedures to ensure compliance with the SCRA,” HVFCU president and CEO Mary Madden said in a statement.
In addition, HVFCU said it took additional steps, beyond regulatory requirements, including expanding annual SCRA training to all staff and creating a dedicated link and phone number for service members on HVFCU's website.
A spokeswoman with the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's Office was not immediately available for comment.
Related:
Federal Consumer Agency Considers Curbs on Class Action Waivers
In 'Ambac,' Judge Attempts to Make Sense of New York's Economic Loss Rule
Second Circuit Upholds Decision to Block Credit Union Regulator From Bringing Mortgage Securities Suit
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllProsecutors Ask Judge to Question Charlie Javice Lawyer Over Alleged Conflict
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250