Trump Administration Fingerprint Requirement for Immigration Sponsors Keeps Children Detained for Weeks or Months, NYCLU Class Action Claims
The New York Civil Liberties Union claims that a Trump administration policy on fingerprint-based background checks for immigrant household members has led to the highest level in history of migrant children being locked up in government custody.
November 07, 2018 at 02:40 PM
4 minute read
The New York Civil Liberties Union has launched a national putative class action claiming that a Trump administration policy on fingerprint-based background checks for immigrant household members has led to the highest level in history of migrant children being locked up in government custody away from their parents.
Calling the policy and the “predictable” administrative delays that come with it “unconscionable,” the civil rights group filed its lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Tuesday. The 23-page suit, which the group brought in conjunction with Morrison & Foerster and the National Center for Youth Law, names as plaintiffs six migrant children currently in custody who allegedly have been waiting between two weeks and nearly four months for the results of their sponsors' fingerprint background checks.
In September, the number of migrant children in government custody stood at 12,800, which has been reported as the highest amount ever, Naomi Dann, an NYCLU spokeswoman, said in an email to the Law Journal.
The complaint contends that the Trump administration's fingerprinting requirements, made effective in June, violate the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, a federal statute that requires the prompt release of children from immigration detention.
Moreover, the suit alleges, the requirements also violate constitutional-based due process rights of the children and their parents, the federal Administrative Procedure Act and a 1997 consent decree governing the care of unaccompanied immigrant children known as the “Flores Settlement.”
The Office of Refugee Resettlement, which is the agency responsible for immigrant children in government custody and is part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, said Wednesday in an email that, as a matter of policy, Health and Human Services does not comment on matters related to pending litigation.
ORR began requiring fingerprint checks of children's parents and all of their household members in June 2018, soon after adopting new policies to share fingerprints with Immigration and Customs Enforcement for enforcement purposes, the lawsuit and an NYCLU news release said.
The fingerprint-based background checks are now allegedly adding weeks and months to the length of time migrant children are detained, while family members wait for appointments to have their fingerprints taken at one of “the limited sites” ORR has set up, the NYCLU claims.
Then the family members wait weeks longer—and sometimes months longer—for results to be processed, the lawsuit claims.
“The longer children are detained the more likely they are to suffer irreversible psychological harm, relive trauma, fall behind in school, and, for those who turn 18 in custody, risk being transferred to an adult facility facing deportation proceedings,” said Paige Austin, an NYCLU staff attorney, in a statement. She added that the long delays also “exposed the [children's] family members to the risk of deportation.”
Prior to implementation of ORR's June policy, only nonparent relatives and nonrelatives seeking to sponsor children in ORR custody were required to submit fingerprints for background checks. Household members didn't need to be fingerprinted unless there was a special concern for the child's safety, the lawsuit and news release said.
Because more than 40 percent of children in ORR custody are released to a parent, the changes have “hugely increased” the number of people who have to be fingerprinted, but ORR has not taken the steps needed to ensure that fingerprinting can occur in a timely fashion, the NYCLU said.
The suit is seeking to represent a class of more than 1,000 children in custody whose release is contingent on the fingerprint-based background check of their sponsor or the sponsor's household members.
Morrison & Foerster, the American Civil Liberties Union and the National Center for Youth Law all filed the lawsuit with the NYCLU and are working the case. Michael Birnbaum, a Morrison & Foerster partner in New York, noted in a statement made in the news release that “Morrison & Foerster is proud to stand alongside the NYCLU, ACLU, and NCYL as we continue our advocacy on behalf of migrant children.”
|This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrade Fixtures In New York Eminent Domain Cases - What Qualifies and How Are They Valued?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Section 1782 Practice Pointers From Recent Decisions
- 2Democratic State AGs Revel in Role as Last Line of Defense Against Trump Agenda
- 3Decision of the Day: Split Circuit Panel Bars Enforcement of Ivory Law's 'Display Restriction' on Antique Group Members
- 4Chiesa Shahinian Bolsters Corporate Practice With 5 From Newark Boutique
- 52 Years After Paul Plevin Merger, Quarles & Brady’s Revenue Up More than 13%
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250