Former AG Schneiderman Will Not Be Criminally Charged Over Abuse Allegations
Schneiderman said in a statement responding to Singas' decision not to bring charges that he spent time in a rehab facility following his resignation and that he acknowledges his conduct with the women was wrong.
November 08, 2018 at 11:20 AM
5 minute read
Former Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who resigned in May amid allegations of domestic abuse from four women, will not face criminal charges, Nassau County District Attorney Madeline Singas said Thursday.
Singas was appointed as a special prosecutor in the case by Gov. Andrew Cuomo in May after an article in The New Yorker detailed the accounts of women who claimed Schneiderman became physically violent with them when they were dating, particularly when he had been drinking.
Singas said in a statement that she believed the women who came forward but that legal impediments, including statutes of limitations, prevented her office from bringing charges against Schneiderman.
“Following an exhaustive review, evaluation of the facts, the law, and applicable statutes of limitations, I have concluded our investigation into the allegations of physical abuse allegedly committed by former New York State Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman without criminal charges,” Singas said.
Schneiderman said in a statement responding to Singas' decision not to bring charges that he spent time in a rehab facility following his resignation and that he acknowledges his conduct with the women was wrong.
“I recognize that District Attorney Singas' decision not to prosecute does not mean I have done nothing wrong. I accept full responsibility for my conduct in my relationships with my accusers, and for the impact it had on them,” Schneiderman said. “After spending time in a rehab facility, I am committed to a lifelong path of recovery and making amends to those I have harmed. I apologize for any and all pain that I have caused, and I apologize to the people of the State of New York for disappointing them after they put their trust in me.”
The decision concludes a six-month-long investigation into the conduct of Schneiderman, who resigned just three hours after the magazine article was published in May. The article included interviews and details from three women who claimed Schneiderman had physically abused them during their relationship. A fourth women claimed Schneiderman slapped her when she rejected his advances.
One of the women, Michelle Manning Barish, said in the article that at one point Schneiderman slapped her hard, with an open hand, causing significant pain to her ear. The pain caused her to visit a doctor, who removed dry blood from her ear. She also claimed Schneiderman threatened to kill her if she ended their relationship.
Another woman, Tanya Selvaratnam, said in the article that Schneiderman made the same threat to her. She described him as “a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde” figure and claimed that aside from slapping her in bed, he also choked her and spat at her. Selvaratnam, who was born in Sri Lanka, also said he called her his “brown slave” at times.
Two other women claimed anonymously in the article that Schneiderman was also physically violent with them. One said that Schneiderman, again, slapped her in bed without asking her for her consent. Another claimed that Schneiderman slapped her after she rebuffed his advances.
The physical actions were followed by verbal abuse, according to the women. Selvaratnam, for example, said Schneiderman once told her to get plastic surgery to remove scars she had from an operation related to cancer.
The problems were compounded by Schneiderman's problems with alcohol, the women claimed. They said he would often be drunk when they were at his home, and sometimes had accidents caused by his drinking. Selvaratnam, for example, said in January 2017, he called her from a hospital emergency room because he fell and cut himself after a night of drinking.
The allegations were extensive, but Singas said the state's current laws prevented her office from bringing criminal charges against Schneiderman. She sent a legislative proposal to state lawmakers on Thursday to change the state's penal law in a way that may have allowed her to prosecute him over the allegations.
The current law, according to Singas, only allows charges if the offender's intent when hitting someone during sex is to “alarm, harass, or annoy” the victim. The victim also has to provide proof that they suffered “substantial pain” or a physical injury, Singas said.
Her proposal would change the law to allow charges when someone slaps, strikes, shoves, or kicks someone during sex without consent, regardless of their intent. It would be a misdemeanor that would carry up to one year in jail. The crime would have a two-year statute of limitations, which would have allowed Schneiderman to be charged in at least one of the cases.
“This legislation fills a gap in the law that is essential to properly sanction sexually motivated violence that may leave the victims with deep emotional wounds, even if they do not sustain physical injuries as defined under New York penal law,” Singas said. “This new misdemeanor-level offense will afford law enforcement an additional tool to protect victims of domestic abuse, and I encourage the legislature to pass this bill next session.”
Singas was appointed as special prosecutor in the case because Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. had, at the time, been under review by Schneiderman's office for his handling of possible criminal prosecution into former film mogul Harvey Weinstein.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Class Action Filed Against Houston Health Savings Account Firm for Allegedly Confiscating Client Funds
- 2These 2 Lawyers Just Became Florida Judges
- 3'Disease-Causing Bacteria': Colgate and Tom’s of Maine Face Toothpaste Class Action
- 4Trump's SEC Overhaul: What It Means for Big Law Capital Markets, Crypto Work
- 5Armstrong Teasdale's London Creditors Face Big Losses
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250