Satanist Group Sues Netflix, Warner Bros. Over Use of Statue in New 'Sabrina' Series
The federal lawsuit claims the group's copyright was infringed when the online video streaming company used a replica of its Baphomet with Children statute in the new series.
November 08, 2018 at 04:40 PM
3 minute read
Organized Satanists have claimed in a new federal lawsuit that Netflix and Warner Bros. Television have illegally trod upon its copyright of a unique version of the occult deity Baphomet, which is used in the new series “Chilling Adventures of Sabrina.”
According to the complaint filed Thursday by the The Satanic Temple in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the use of the satanic symbol is “a textbook example … that copyright law protects unique expressions, but not the ideas themselves.”
Baphomet, as the complaint notes, is a historical deity with its roots in accusations of devil worship against the Crusades-era Knights Templar. The creature is traditionally a composite of various religious imagery, with the head of a goat and the body of a woman associated with a figure from Jewish mysticism.
At issue in the lawsuit is the version of the occult figure The Satanic Temple says is its intellectual property. This Baphomet with Children involves children at its side, wearing specific clothing, with the figure itself having an exposed male chest, rather than the traditional “exposed large voluptuous female breasts.” The complaint notes that traditional expressions of Baphomet depict the deity as “hermaphroditic.”
The group takes issue not just with the Netflix series' use of the image, but with how it is used. According to the complaint, the Baphomet statute is featured prominently throughout as being associated with the evil antagonists of the show. This, the complaint alleges, is “in stark contrast” to the tenets and beliefs of The Satanic Temple, resulting in a false and defamatory depiction of the group.
“TST does not promote evil and instead holds to the basic principle that undue suffering is bad, and that which reduces suffering is good,” the complaint explains, adding: “Defendants misappropriated the TST Baphomet Children in ways implying that the monument stands for evil. Among other morally repugnant actions, the Sabrina Series' evil antagonists engage in cannibalism and forced-worship of a patriarchal deity.”
The complaint claims federal copyright infringement and false designation, as well as injury to business reputation under New York law. The organization seeks $50 million in potential damages.
Name attorney Bruce Lederman of the New York-based business law and real estate law boutique D'Agostino, Levine, Landesman & Lederman represents the organization. He did not immediately return a request for comment.
A Netflix spokesman referred a request for comment to WB, the production company, which declined to comment.
Related:
Second Circuit Examines Evolving Infringement Standard
Net Neutrality and Open Internet: How We Got Here and Where We Are Headed
Where Moral Rights May Conflict With the Removal of Confederate Statues
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Judge Steps Down After Conviction for Intoxicated Driving
American Bar Association Calls for Enforceable Supreme Court Ethics Code
Trending Stories
- 1Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
- 2Divided State Supreme Court Clears the Way for Child Sexual Abuse Cases Against Church, Schools
- 3From Hospital Bed to Legal Insights: Lessons in Life, Law, and Lawyering
- 4‘Diminishing Returns’: Is the Superstar Supreme Court Lawyer Overvalued?
- 5LinkedIn Accused of Sharing LinkedIn Learning Video Data With Meta
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250