Bar Exam Pass Rates Dive at 5 NY Schools While Top Programs Increase Their Advantage
With schools at the upper echelons improving and those on the lowest rungs struggling, the gap between the best- and worst-performing New York schools widened to almost 50 percentage points.
November 13, 2018 at 02:28 PM
5 minute read
Graduates of New York's top two law schools performed even better on the July bar exam than their classmates did a year ago but passing rates decreased at 12 New York schools and five saw steep declines.
At one-third of the state's 15 schools, the pass rates dropped by more than 8 percentage points. Three schools saw double-digit reductions.
With schools at the upper echelons improving and those on the lowest rungs struggling, the gap between the best- and worst-performing New York schools widened to just short of 50 percentage points. That's nearly double what it was in 2016, the first year that New York State participated in the Multistate Bar Exam.
As always, there are caveats. The graduating classes of some schools were so small that the failure of a few students made a big difference. Some institutions say they have more high-performing pro bono scholars who take the exam in February rather than July. And law schools who admit lower-performing students have more work to do to prepare them for the exam.
But still, the trend was unmistakable. The graduates of the law schools with the highest rankings from U.S. News and World Report were way more likely to pass the bar exam than the graduates of lower-ranked schools.
Less than half of Touro Law Center graduates passed, prompting the dean to write a letter to alumni promising reforms. Touro's pass rate was 16.2 percentage points lower than last year. At The City University of New York School of Law, the passing rate declined 13 percentage points. The Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University saw a loss of 11.6 percentage points, Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University dropped 8.4 percentage points and Syracuse University College of Law 8.2 percentage points.
New York's plummeting scores mirror performance on the bar examination nationwide, which sunk to a 34-year low, according to the National Conference of Bar Examiners, which released results on the Multistate Bar Examination in September.
“In light of this year's downturn in performance on bar exams across the country, I echo the concern expressed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners about lower Law School Admissions Test (LSAT) scores, particularly in the bottom quartile of students,” said Syracuse University College of Law Dean Craig M. Boise. “Our focus on raising the median LSAT score for the bottom quartile of our 2018 entering class resulted in a 2 percentage point increase in that important metric over the previous class, which bodes well for our students' future performance on the bar exam.”
While Albany Law School, Columbia Law School and New York University School of Law improved their performance between 2017 and 2018, Albany's 75.9 percent pass rate was still 6.8 percentage points below the school's score in 2016.
Graduates of Cornell Law School and Fordham University School of Law did not perform as well as their 2017 classmates but the declines were moderate. Cornell went down 1.6 percentage points and Fordham 4.4 percentage points.
“I am not too alarmed by our small drop relative to last year for a couple of reasons,” said Cornell Dean Eduardo M. Peñalver. “We tend to bounce around from year to year by a point or two, and our pass rate at 94 percent remains among the highest in the state. The difference between this year's performance and last year's 96 percent is just two additional students failing the New York bar.”
Dean Mike Simons of St. John's University School of Law, which saw 86.7 percent of its graduates pass the exam, said the school has been expanding its bar preparation since 2016. Besides its bar prep course, the school has made an effort to keep the graduates at the law school studying together every weekday in June and July, the crucial bar preparation months.
From Monday to Thursday, the school, with the help of donations, provides dinner at 7 p.m., reducing the likelihood that hungry graduates knock off earlier. And to get the prospective lawyers back in on Friday, the school serves lunch. And there are bagels some mornings and Taco Tuesdays. St. John's bar pass rate dipped 2.5 percentage points but the loss didn't erase the 12.7 percentage point gain from 2016 to 2017.
Six schools performed above the statewide average of 83 percent for first-time test takers at American Bar Association-accredited law schools while nine schools were under the statewide average. The 83 percent was down three percentage points from the year before. The average was 81 percent for first-time test takers from New York law schools.
At 72.3 percent, Brooklyn Law School was down 6.3 percentage points.
“We recognize that we have a critical mission to prepare our students to pass the bar exam. While we are pleased for our students who passed, we are deeply concerned and disappointed that our pass rate was not higher,” said Maryellen Fullerton, Brooklyn's interim dean. “Our entire law school community is committed to improving our bar exam results.”
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readTik Tok’s ‘Blackout Challenge’ Confronts the Limits of CDA Section 230 Immunity
6 minute readEnemy of the State: Foreign Sovereign Immunity and Criminal Prosecutions after ‘Halkbank’
10 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250