Lawyer for 'El Chapo' Calls Alleged Drug Kingpin Victim of Conspiracy as Trial Opens
Opening arguments began Tuesday in Brooklyn amid beefed-up security for the drug conspiracy trial against alleged drug kingpin and prison escape artist Joaquin Guzmán Loera, better known as El Chapo.
November 13, 2018 at 07:10 PM
5 minute read
Defense attorneys for alleged drug kingpin and prison escape artist Joaquin Guzmán Loera, better known as El Chapo, and prosecutors presented opening arguments on Tuesday in the drug conspiracy trial against Guzmán in a federal courthouse in Brooklyn that is under beefed-up security.
The team of prosecutors from U.S. attorneys offices in New York and Florida portrayed Guzmán as the ruthless and hands-on leader of a vast drug enterprise in Mexico that got its start as a go-between for drug producers in Central and South America and distributors in major cities in the United States that scaled up so quickly over the past few decades that at one point Guzmán himself had some difficulty keeping track of shipments.
But Jeffrey Lichtman, a prominent criminal defense attorney who successfully represented John A. Gotti, the son of Gambino crime family boss John J. Gotti, argued that the government's case is built on the testimony of untrustworthy and criminal witnesses “who will make your skin crawl” and sought to portray his client as the victim of a conspiracy between bosses now running the Sinaloa Cartel and government and law enforcement officials in both the United States and Mexico.
“While he's been in prison in America, the flow of drugs hasn't stopped,” Lichtman said of Guzmán. “Nothing's changed. Business as usual.”
Guzmán faces 17 counts for allegedly running the cartel between 1989 and 2014, in which it made billions by moving massive amounts of heroin, cocaine and marijuana into the U.S. by means that included underground tunnels and submarines.
Prosecutors allege Guzmán and Ismael Zambada García, who authorities say is currently running the cartel and who is at large in Mexico, used hit men to murder rival drug lords and traffickers within their own organization who they suspected of cooperating with the government.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Adam Fels of the Southern District of Florida also said that prosecutors will present evidence that Guzmán, who he said was fond of brandishing a diamond-encrusted handgun and a gold-plated AK-47, personally carried out a murder and will show jurors a video of Guzmán violently interrogating a rival.
“Money, drugs, murder. A vast global narcotics trafficking organization,” Fels said. “This is what this case is about. This is what the evidence in the case will prove.”
Fels also noted that Guzmán is known for making breathtaking escapes from prison, such as his 2015 escape from a Mexican prison via a milelong tunnel.
Guzmán, who appeared in court wearing a dark suit with a blue-and-gray plaid tie, faces a maximum sentence of life in prison, and the government seeks $14 billion in forfeiture.
The prosecution also includes Andrea Goldbarg, Hiral Mehta, Patricia Notopoulos, Gina Parlovecchio and Michael Robotti from the Eastern District of New York.
In additional to Lichtman, Guzmán's defense team includes Eduardo Balarezo, who represented convicted drug lord Alfredo Beltrán Leyva; Michael Lambert Mariel Colon MIro of the Law Offices of Michael Lambert; and William Purpura of the Law Offices of Purpura & Purpura.
Prior to the presentments, much of the day was spent finding replacements for two jurors who indicated that they would not be able to sit through the entirety of the trial, which is expected to last 16 weeks. One juror said he is self-employed and would end up losing money serving on the jury, while another said she has been feeling anxious since she was picked for the jury.
The jury was sworn in after 3 p.m.
Judge Brian Cogan of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, who presides over the case, has ordered several measures to increase safety in and around the trial: For one, the jurors are anonymous and partially sequestered.
There is an increased law enforcement presence at the Eastern District courthouse from several federal law enforcement agencies and the New York City Police Department for the trial, and Homeland Security agents are patrolling the area with bomb-sniffing dogs.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All2nd Circuit Weighs Racial Bias, Retaliation Claims Against Amazon in COVID-19 Suit
Creative Branding and Maximizing Intellectual Property Protection With Color
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250