Court System to Survey Attorneys About Sexual Harassment, Gender Bias in Courts
Starting this month, the New York State Judicial Committee on Women in the Courts will administer an online survey to a random sample of attorneys to see what progress has been made in eliminating gender bias in the courts and if there is more work to be done, according to a release from Office of Court Administration.
November 15, 2018 at 05:18 PM
4 minute read
More than 30 years since the release of a landmark report detailing pervasive discrimination against women in New York courts, an Office of Court Administration committee of judges and attorneys tapped to address bias issues is conducting a new survey to get a comprehensive look at gender fairness in the courts.
Starting this month, the New York State Judicial Committee on Women in the Courts will administer an online survey to a random sample of attorneys to see what progress has been made in eliminating gender bias in the courts and if there is more work to be done, according to a release from the OCA.
When conducting its survey on bias in the courts more than three decades ago, the task force that eventually gave rise to the women's committee focused its energies on assessing the treatment of women litigants, attorneys and court employees.
This time, the committee will focus on facility issues that affect female attorneys, such as making accommodations for lactation; and sexual harassment, said committee chairwoman Betty Weinberg Ellerin, a retired state Supreme Court justice who served on the Appellate Division, First Department and who is now senior counsel at Alston & Bird.
Over the past year, since the #MeToo movement has led to the ouster of powerful people in a wide array of institutions, sexual harassment and abuse has become a top priority in many workplaces.
New York's court system has not seen the kind of high-profile exits that have shaken up Hollywood and Washington, D.C., though as the Law Journal reported earlier this month, the court system, with more than 16,000 employees, has not gone without its own allegations of sexual misconduct.
Since the task force conducted its work in the mid-1980s, society has reframed its views of what is considered inappropriate behavior in the workplace.
“The fact is that in many instances the same kind of conduct maybe existed in the 80s,” Ellerin said.
The women's committee is building off of work started by a task force created in 1984 at the behest of Sol Wachtler, then the chief judge of the state Court of Appeals, to study how women are treated in the courts—as employees, judges, attorneys and litigants—and launched a 22-month investigation into the matter.
When the task force handed over its report in 1986, the picture it painted for what women endured in the court system was a dark one: bias against women was rampant, the report states, and women disproportionately faced a “climate of condescension, indifference and hostility.”
At the time, physical abuse was cited as the reason for divorces granted in almost 40 percent of cases, the report states. Yet some Family Court judges on the bench back then seemed underinformed about domestic violence. It was not uncommon for victims to be blamed for provoking attacks against them, and not to be believed that they were being abused unless their injuries were visible.
As for female attorneys, while their numbers were growing in the mid-1980s, with some reporting significant improvements in the way they're treated, there was a “widespread perception” that judges, male attorneys and court employees did not treat female attorneys with the same dignity as their male counterparts.
The most commonly cited examples of inappropriate conduct toward female attorneys were being subjected to being addressed in familiar terms, comments about their appearance or sexual advances, according to the task force report.
“While we have come a long way in eliminating gender bias in the courts since the release of the task force's seminal report, our work is not yet finished,” said Chief Judge Janet DiFiore in the news release. “We must continue, through study, education and reform, to open the doors of opportunity and tear down barriers to justice.”
Read more:
NY Court System's Handling of Sexual Harassment Complaints Criticized
In #MeToo Era, New York Courts' New Sexual Misconduct Policy Was Done Too Quietly, Critics Charge
Witnesses Say Judiciary Needs More Transparency & Reporting Options on Sexual Misconduct
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Reluctant to Trust'?: NY Courts Continue to Grapple With Complexities of Jury Diversity
Justice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Ex-SDNY Clerk Can't Convince 2nd Circuit That Bribery Sentence Was Improper
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250