SCOTUS Grants Cert to Mull NY AG's Ability to Depose Cabinet Sec. in Census Case
The nation's high court set a briefing schedule over the question of a lower court's ability to expand the discovery process, with oral arguments scheduled in February.
November 16, 2018 at 03:41 PM
3 minute read
The U.S. Supreme Court issued an order Friday saying it will take up the issue of whether the New York attorney general may depose U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross in its challenge to the Trump administration's plan to include a question on citizenship status in the 2020 census.
The nation's high court granted certiorari to a mandamus petition by the Department of Justice on Friday, setting a schedule for briefings beginning Dec. 17. Oral arguments in the case were scheduled for Feb. 19, 2019.
The Supreme Court's decision to take the dispute comes as the underlying challenge to the census question proceeds at trial in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman declined DOJ requests to postpone the trial ahead of decisions from the Supreme Court, finding that any outcome from the trial would be undoubtedly appealed by the parties regardless. The trial has proceeded apace, despite the DOJ's fast-tracked higher court appellate process.
Currently, oral arguments in the bench trial over the legality of the plan to include the citizenship question rather than use administrative data is set for Nov. 27.
The Supreme Court has already played a pivotal role in the litigation. In October, the court stayed the ability for the plaintiffs, among them the New York Attorney General's Office, to depose Ross as part of the litigation. At that time the court indicated it would likely grant cert on the question of the New York attorney general's ability to depose the cabinet secretary.
Shortly thereafter, the Justice Department leapfrogged the U.S. Court Appeals for the Second Circuit and filed a mandamus petition with the Supreme Court. DOJ attorneys have asked the high court to decide whether Furman can order a wide scope of discovery to probe the decision-making process Ross navigated in formulating the census question.
Challengers argue the discovery is necessary to show that racial animus was at the core of seeking the citizenship status of all census respondents—a move they say would likely result in an under-count that will have a negative impact on communities.
“The trial record closed earlier today and we are confident in the strength of our case,” said the spokeswoman for New York Attorney General's Office. “The record clearly shows that the secretary's decision to demand citizenship status on the 2020 Census is illegal. It's important to note that the Supreme Court's decision to grant cert is specific to the question of extra-record discovery.”
The U.S. Justice Department press office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Substantive Deficiencies': Judge Grants Big Law Motion Dismissing Ivy League Price-Fixing Claims
3 minute readAttorneys Ordered to Apologize to South Philadelphia Residents Following 'Scream Test' Experiment
5 minute readDOJ: TD Bank Agrees to Pay $3B Over Anti-Money Laundering Program Violations
2 minute readNY Appeals Court Grants J&J's Subpoena for Talc Expert as 'Clearly Relevant'
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250