Attorney Charged With $600K Theft From Harlem Church Resigns, Will Pay Restitution
John Omololu Shasanmi resigned from the bar while appearing to admit that he engaged in professional misconduct. The criminal case against him remains alive, and his lawyer said that, at this time, Shasanmi has no plans to plead guilty.
November 19, 2018 at 02:45 PM
5 minute read
A Manhattan lawyer has resigned from the bar and admitted that he can't “defend himself” against professional-misconduct allegations that say he stole $600,000 from a Harlem church he was representing.
The lawyer, John Omololu Shasanmi, has also agreed before an Appellate Division, First Department panel to pay restitution of $601,874.99 to the church and reimburse the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection for any awards made to the church in connection with its loss caused by Shasanmi's misconduct, according to a panel decision granting Shasanmi's resignation motion.
At the same time, Shasanmi is under criminal indictment by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office based on what appear to be the same allegations: stealing $600,000 from the historic Second Providence Baptist Church through misappropriating for his own use deposited escrow funds connected to a real estate transaction.
It is unclear whether Shasanmi's admission cited by the First Department that “he cannot successfully defend himself against these allegations” in the attorney-discipline matter indicates any intention to admit guilt in the criminal case. His attorney, Andre Travieso, reached by phone on Friday, a day after the panel issued its Nov. 15 decision, declined to comment when asked both about Shasanmi's admission of being unable to defend himself and about his client's decision to resign from the bar.
Asked about Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance Jr.'s criminal case against his client, Travieso said that Shasanmi “hasn't pleaded guilty yet on anything.” He added that the “criminal [case] is still fluid.”
Travieso, of Travieso Law in Manhattan, also said, when asked about any possible forthcoming plea by his client, that Shasanmi does not intend to plead guilty at this time.
The Manhattan DA's Office declined to comment after being emailed questions about the potential impact of Shasanmi's statements—made in an affidavit cited by the First Department—regarding his misconduct as an attorney. The questions to the DA included how the office views what is stated in the First Department's decision and whether information in the decision amounts to evidence to be used in the criminal case.
The Second Providence Baptist Church did not return a call seeking comment.
In July, the DA's Office announced that Shasanmi had been charged with two counts of second-degree grand larceny and one count of third-degree criminal possession of a forged instrument in relation to his handling of escrow funds that were to go to the church.
The office said that Second Providence Baptist had retained Shasanmi to represent it and act as an escrow agent in a real-estate transaction with Azimuth Development Group. In December 2014, Shasanmi allegedly received a $250,000 deposit that he was supposed to hold in escrow and which would later be paid to Second Providence if the deal, which involved the church allowing Azimuth Development to erect a residential building on its West 116th Street property, closed. By April 23, 2015, Shasanmi had misappropriated nearly all of the funds for his own use, according to Manhattan prosecutors.
After the deal closed in April 2017, he received an additional $350,000 to be held in escrow, the prosecutors said. But Shasanmi held the money in his personal bank account rather than in an escrow account and again misappropriated the funds for his personal use, according to the DA's Office. The prosecutors further alleged that by Nov. 21, 2017, only $100 of the funds due to the church remained.
Prosecutors also said that Shasanmi, at one point, emailed the church's pastor a forged Citibank statement indicating that all of the deposited funds were being held in an account in the name of “Law Office of John Shasanmi.”
In past years, Shasanmi worked in Big Law as a Pepper Hamilton associate and in a role at Dewey & LeBoeuf and DuPont, according to a newsletter, online listings and a bar article. He was admitted to the state bar in 2006, according to the First Department, and as of July he lived in Delaware.
The First Department panel explained in its decision that Shasanmi was seeking an order from the court accepting his resignation as a New York state attorney. The panel added that the First Department Attorney Grievance Committee, which has been investigating Shasanmi's alleged misconduct tied to the church, did not oppose the resignation and asked the appeals court to accept it.
The panel further wrote that in an affidavit Shasanmi “acknowledges that he is the subject of an investigation by the [Attorney Grievance] Committee involving allegations of professional misconduct regarding his failure to open an attorney trust account and maintain bookkeeping records, his use of a personal bank account as a depository for his clients' escrow funds and his use of those funds, which exceeded $600,000, for personal purposes.”
It then added that Shasanmi “attests that he cannot successfully defend himself against these allegations based upon the facts and circumstances of the professional conduct described herein.”
Moreover, the unanimous panel, composed of Justices Rolando Acosta, Barbara Kapnick, David Friedman, Marcy Kahn and Cynthia Kern, wrote that Shasanmi “consents to an order by this Court directing him to make monetary restitution to the affected client, Second Providence Church.”
Later in the opinion, after ruling that “in light of [Shasanmi's] compliant affidavit and the [Grievance] Committee's support, we accept [Shasanmi's resignation],” the panel stated that Shasanmi is “directed, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90(6-a), to make restitution to Second Providence Church in the amount of $601,874.99 and to reimburse the Lawyers' Fund for Client Protection for any award(s) made to Second Providence Church.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Partner Presented With State Bar's Scheindlin Award
'A World of Credit': Ex-FTX Executive Gary Wang Sentenced to Time Served Following Cooperation
Manhattan Prosecutors Say They Will Oppose Efforts by Trump Legal Team to Dismiss Case
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250