Disbarred Lawyer Fighting to Toss Conviction for Bribery of Private Agent to Gain Client Referrals
A disbarred criminal defense attorney and his paralegal are fighting to toss out their 2016 convictions of bribing an agent from the New York City Criminal Justice Agency to steer clients their way, arguing that the employee was not a public official.
November 20, 2018 at 06:44 PM
4 minute read
A disbarred criminal defense attorney and his paralegal are fighting to toss out their 2016 convictions of bribing an agent from the New York City Criminal Justice Agency to steer clients their way, arguing that the employee was not a public official.
But at oral arguments for the appeals Thursday before a panel of the Appellate Division, First Department, the attorneys for former attorney Benjamin Yu and paralegal Jose Nuñez were met with justices who questioned how an agent from the CJA, a private nonprofit that serves the state court system by interviewing defendants to determine if they can be released on recognizance, is not providing a government function.
“They weren't hired to help the defendants,” said Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels during an exchange with Jan Hoth of the Center for Appellate Litigation, who argued for the defendants. “They were hired to assist the courts.”
The CJA, formerly called the Pretrial Services Agency, was established in 1973, though the seeds for the entity were planted in the early 1960s when industrialist Louis Schweitzer and magazine publisher Herb Sturz established the Vera Foundation to address income-based inequality in New York City's bail system.
The agency conducts prescreening interviews of defendants while they are waiting for their arraignments to determine what kind of ties they have to the community and then makes recommendations to judges as to how likely the defendants are to come back to court if they aren't held in jail.
According to the Manhattan District Attorney's Office, from September 2013 to September 2014, a CJA employee who conducted interviews sent text messages containing defendants' information to Yu and Nuñez and convinced defendants to retain Yu's services with promises of shorter holding periods.
In turn, according to the DA, Nuñez paid the employee between $200 and $1,000 to develop profiles on arrestees and to refer them to Yu.
“This was corruption of the system,” said Assistant District Attorney Davis Cohn, who appeared at the oral argument for the Manhattan DA.
In 2015, Dwane Smith, another disbarred criminal defense attorney, pleaded guilty to third-degree bribery for his role in the scheme. He was sentenced to six months in jail followed by probation.
In 2016, following a jury trial, Yu and Nuñez were convicted of second-degree bribery, fourth-degree conspiracy and 13 counts of second-degree rewarding official misconduct.
In court papers, Patrick Brackley, Yu's attorney, concedes that the kickback scheme was “unethical” but that it could not be considered bribery as it is defined by statute.
Yu and Nuñez were given prison sentences of three to nine years and have been free on bond pending their appeals.
At the oral argument before the First Department, Justice Ellen Gesmer said to Hoth that Yu and Nuñez's actions amounted to a “corruption” of the system, saying the defendants steered to Yu may have had their arraignments expedited.
“It's still a violation of the fundamental part of the criminal justice system that defendants not be pushed toward private counsel for improper purposes,” Gesmer said.
Read more:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter 2024's Regulatory Tsunami, Financial Services Firms Hope Storm Clouds Break
GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
Trending Stories
- 1A&O Shearman, Hogan Lovells and the Stories That Shaped Africa This Year
- 2Borden Ladner Gervais Cyber Expert Warns of AI-Boosted Ransomware Attacks
- 3Phila. Judge Upholds $68.5M Verdict Over Construction Worker's Death
- 4Biden Vetoes Bill to Create More Federal Judgeships
- 5Memories of a Straight Shooter
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250