No Decision Yet on New State Senate Judiciary Chair, Democratic Leader Says
State Sen. Brad Hoylman, the current ranking Democrat on the judiciary committee, said Monday that he would be happy to chair any committee assigned to him.
November 26, 2018 at 04:30 PM
4 minute read
The new chair of the judiciary committee in the New York State Senate has not yet been selected, Senate Democratic Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins said during a press conference Monday.
Stewart-Cousins, who was unanimously elected Monday to lead her party's conference in the majority in January, is tasked with choosing who will command the all-powerful committee, which reviews appointments to the bench that require Senate approval and legislation involving the state court system.
When asked during the press conference following her election whether she has made any decisions on committee chairs, Stewart-Cousins said she had not.
That includes the judiciary committee, which is currently in Republican hands, as is the entire Senate. Eight new Democrats elected earlier this month will flip the chamber to give their party a solid majority in January for the first time in nearly a decade.
Sen. John Bonacic, R-Mount Hope, is the current chair of the judiciary committee. After announcing his retirement earlier this year, Bonacic saw his district go to a Democrat in November.
His eight-year tenure chairing the judiciary committee was unlike any other in recent history. The committee approved all seven judges that currently sit on the New York Court of Appeals, including Chief Judge Janet DiFiore, the state's top judge.
Each of those judges was appointed by Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who Bonacic said in July that any future chair of the judiciary committee should be wary of. During an interview with the New York Law Journal, Bonacic warned that Cuomo could try to gain more control over the judiciary by changing the court system's funding levels or through his appointments to state courts.
Those are issues the next judiciary chair will work on directly with DiFiore, who Bonacic said was frequently in contact with him during state budget negotiations. DiFiore would also work with him on ways to improve the state's court system, Bonacic said.
He also approved countless other judicial appointments by Cuomo, including several to the Court of Claims. Judges from that court are frequently substituted to hear cases usually designated to State Supreme Court Justices, a practice Bonacic did not agree with.
State Sen. Brad Hoylman, D-Manhattan, is currently the ranking Democrat on the judiciary committee. He's also the ranking member on the investigations and government operations committee and was the top Democrat on the environmental conservation committee at one time. He said Monday that he would be happy to chair any committee assigned to him.
“We'll see what happens. Obviously the leader has to make the decision,” Hoylman said. “But any committee that the leader assigns me, I will gladly chair. That will be a great day when we can actually have hearings, pass bills in public, and make progressive change.”
There will be 14 attorneys in the Democratic conference when new members are sworn in next year. Hoylman is one of them. Eight of the other attorneys are incumbents that were already in the conference, and five will be fresh faces in the upper chamber.
There is no requirement that an attorney chair the judiciary committee, just like there is no requirement that a member with a background in health chair that committee. But there is a precedent for naming an attorney to the position.
Bonacic, who is an attorney, has chaired the committee since 2011. Former State Sen. John Sampson, a Democrat and also an attorney, chaired the committee before him. State Sen. John DeFrancisco, a Republican attorney, held the post before Sampson.
At least one of the attorneys in the Democratic conference has already been ruled out for the position. Sen. Michael Gianaris, D-Queens, was selected as the deputy majority leader of his conference on Monday as well.
Stewart-Cousins said announcements on other conference appointments, including committee chairs, will begin to roll out over the next several weeks. The legislative session is scheduled to begin in early January.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllThe Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
7 minute readNot All Secrets Are Trade Secrets: SDNY Examines the Limits of NDA Protection
13 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Corporate Counsel's 2024 Award Winners Performed Legal Wizardry, Gave a Hand Up to Others
- 2Goodwin, Polsinelli, Fox Rothschild Find New Phila. Offices
- 3Helping Lawyers Move Away from ‘Grinding’ and Toward a ‘Flow’
- 4How GC-of-Year Sam Khichi Has Helped CVS Barrel Through Challenges
- 5A Website is Not a ‘Place.’ What Took So Long To Get This Right?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250