Orange County, NY, Family Court Official Resigns in Wake of Bias Investigation
The nature of the complaint was not immediately known Wednesday. The allegation was made by a court assistant against Deacon earlier this year, according to OCA.
November 28, 2018 at 05:25 PM
2 minute read
Richard Deacon, the deputy chief clerk of the Orange County Family Court, resigned in early November after an investigation by the Inspector General's Office into a complaint made against him by another court employee, according to the Office of Court Administration.
The retirement earlier this month of his supervisor, long-time Chief Clerk Elizabeth Holbrook of the Orange County Family Court was also apparently related to the situation, according to a spokesman for OCA.
The nature of the complaint was not immediately known Wednesday. The allegation was made by a court assistant against Deacon earlier this year, according to OCA. That was referred to the Inspector General's Managing Inspector General of Bias Matters, which investigated the complaint. The Office of the Managing Inspector General for Bias Matters reviews complaints of bias regarding race, sexual harassment, disability and several other areas.
At the end of the investigation, the Inspector General's Office recommended Deacon's resignation to Judge Michael Coccoma, who is the deputy chief administrative judge for courts outside New York City, according to OCA. Deacon resigned his position effective Nov. 5.
Holbrook retired from her position following the outcome of the investigation. She had been chief clerk of Orange County Family Court since 1994.
Lynn McKelvey, the chief clerk of Orange County Supreme and County Court, is the current acting chief clerk of Orange Family Court while the position remains vacant.
Contact information to reach Deacon and Holbrook was not publicly available. A request sent to OCA for that information was not immediately returned Wednesday.
It's not unusual for details of bias investigations to be kept confidential by the state court system. Complaints reported to the Inspector General's Office are kept confidential, as are the office's investigations and reports that arise out of a complaint.
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
2 minute readMayor's Advisory Committee To Hold Hearing on Fitness of Judicial Candidates
1 minute readTrending Stories
- 1New University of Chicago Law Course Digs Deeper Into Using Gen AI Responsibly
- 2The Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
- 3Del. Court Holds Stance on Musk's $55.8B Pay Rescission, Awards Shareholder Counsel $345M
- 4Another Senior Boeing Attorney Exits, This One for CLO Post at Jet-Maintenance Company
- 5Bridge the Communication Gap: The Benefits of Having (and Being) a Bilingual Mediator
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250