Protect the Innocent, Prevent Wrongful Conviction
The number of exonerations in New York undermines the assumption that we sufficiently protect the innocent. It is of paramount importance to all New Yorkers and all Americans that the entire criminal justice system work together to ensure only the guilty are convicted.
November 28, 2018 at 02:20 PM
4 minute read
One wrongful conviction is one too many.
But unfortunately, across New York and the rest of the country, there have been numerous exonerations stemming from wrongful convictions.
Just recently we heard about Valentino Dixon, who was exonerated after spending 26 years in prison for a murder in Buffalo that he did not commit. Josiah Galloway was also freed after spending a decade behind bars for a Hempstead shooting carried out by someone else.
These convictions derail the lives of the wrongfully accused and cause tremendous pain for their loved ones. The impact is also felt by the general public, because every time it is proven that an innocent person was sent to prison, public confidence in our justice system is further damaged.
According to the National Registry of Exonerations, New York has had approximately 250 exonerations in its history, second only to Texas. That's more than 2,500 years of innocent people's lives lost behind bars. A majority of those exonerations were due to misconduct by police, prosecutors or other government officials.
In 2009, a New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) Task Force on Wrongful Convictions issued a groundbreaking report concluding that government practices, identification procedures, mishandling of forensic evidence, defense practices, the use of false confessions and the improper use of jailhouse informants were among the leading causes of wrongful convictions.
The report, which included the input of a panel of experts from the criminal justice system who examined 53 of these cases, also recommended a sweeping array of changes to policy, procedure and legislation.
Since that report, our elected state officials have enacted some much-needed changes that were long advocated for by NYSBA. For instance, a state law requiring law enforcement agencies to video record custodial interrogations with individuals accused of serious crimes went into effect earlier this year. The state has also reformed procedures for eyewitness identifications.
Despite these positive efforts, more needs to be done. That's why NYSBA revisited the issue earlier this year with the formation of a new Task Force on Wrongful Convictions. The group is headed by retired New York Supreme Court Justice Barry Kamins, who was the leader of the original Task Force, and former Court of Appeals Judge Robert S. Smith. The Task Force also includes Martin Tankleff, who spent 17 long years behind bars after being wrongfully convicted for the murder of his parents.
Task Force members are reviewing new developments in technology, science, and judicial decisions in order to make affirmative recommendations to reduce the likelihood of more wrongful convictions.
In the decade since our first Task Force released its report, the conduct of prosecutors has emerged as an important factor relating to wrongful convictions. In August, Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed into law the nation's first state Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct to investigate allegations of misconduct which, among other things, can lead to wrongful convictions.
On Jan. 16, 2019, NYSBA will convene a panel discussion during its annual meeting in New York City that will focus on the role of prosecutors in wrongful convictions. The panel will examine the new Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct and include prosecutors, defense attorneys, academics and policy experts who will discuss the commission structure, the scope of its authority, and whether it can withstand the legal challenges brought on by New York prosecutors.
The number of exonerations in New York undermines the assumption that we sufficiently protect the innocent. It is of paramount importance to all New Yorkers and all Americans that the entire criminal justice system work together to ensure only the guilty are convicted.
Michael Miller is president of the New York State Bar Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFor Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
4 minute readBenjamin West and John Singleton Copley: American Painters in London
8 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Ben Brafman Defending Celebrity Rabbi in Lawsuit by Miami Hotel
- 2People in the News—Dec. 23, 2024—Barley Snyder, Marshall Dennehey
- 3How I Made Office Managing Partner: 'Be a Lawyer First, Foremost and Always,' Says Matthew McLaughlin of Venable
- 4Bar Report - Dec. 23
- 5Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250