Western NY Judge Slapped for Presiding in Criminal Cases Despite Conflict
David Porter, a justice of the Allegany Town Court in Cattaraugus County, did not disqualify himself from the cases, even though they were prompted by a land dispute he previously discussed with his neighbor at home, the commission said.
November 28, 2018 at 12:28 PM
4 minute read
A judge from Western New York was publicly admonished by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct on Tuesday for failing to immediately recuse himself from three criminal cases involving his neighbor, whom he spoke to informally about the matter months before the litigation.
David Porter, a justice of the Allegany Town Court in Cattaraugus County, did not disqualify himself from the cases, even though they were prompted by a land dispute he previously discussed with his neighbor at home, the commission said. Porter is not an attorney.
“The moment that respondent welcomed his neighbor into his home and began to discuss the dispute, he should have realized that he was engaging in an ex parte conversation that would require his disqualification if the matter came to his court,” the commission's decision said. “Yet, instead of immediately stepping down when three cases arising out of the dispute came before him, or even disclosing his earlier discussion with his neighbor, respondent issued a criminal summons, conducted the arraignments and made determinations regarding the issuance of an order of protection.”
According to the decision, Porter's neighbor came to his home in May 2015 to ask for his assistance as a judge with a boundary dispute between the neighbor's daughter and her neighbors. Porter told his neighbor that the court couldn't do anything about the problem until law enforcement brought charges in the land dispute.
After a state trooper visited their home, the daughter's neighbor sent a letter to Porter and the daughter alleging harassment by Porter's neighbor. Porter issued a criminal summons for his neighbor in July 2015.
The day before that summons was issued, Porter's neighbor, his daughter and her neighbors were allegedly involved in an altercation that led to two additional indictments. At some point during that altercation, Porter's neighbor allegedly struck his daughter's neighbor with a hammer. The daughter's neighbor had also removed signs posted by his daughter.
The daughter's neighbor was arraigned by Porter about a week after that altercation for allegedly cursing at the daughter during the altercation. Porter arraigned his neighbor in September 2015 for allegedly striking his daughter's neighbor with a hammer.
Porter did not recuse himself from those criminal cases until more than a week later and more than four months after he spoke with his neighbor about the land dispute, according to the commission.
Robert Tembeckjian, the commission's administrator, said in a statement that Porter's actions undermine the public confidence of his ability to be impartial as a judge.
“It undermines confidence in the court's impartiality when a judge presides over a matter despite having prior, private, substantive conversations about it with an interested party,” Tembeckjian said. “To his credit, Judge Porter acknowledges his error and pledges to avoid such conduct in the future.”
Porter has been a justice of the Allegany Town Court since 2006. He was represented before the commission by Vincent Doyle III from Connors in Buffalo.
“Judge Porter has an unblemished record,” Doyle said. “He's a non-lawyer, and he did recuse himself, but the issue was that he should have done it sooner than he did. He understands that and accepts the commission's decision.”
READ MORE:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Final Countdown': SEC Launches Nearly 800% Litigation Surge in October
3 minute readCravath Elevates 7 to Partnership, Up From Last Year
Trending Stories
- 1'They Should Have Tried to Negotiate': Jury Finds Against Insurer
- 2Expert Testimony Regarding Sexual Grooming
- 3Actions Speak Louder Than Words: Law Firms Shrink From 'Performative' Statements
- 4Legaltech Rundown: DeepL Launches AI Translator, BigHand Upgrades Intelligence Software, and More
- 5$149M in Attorney Fees Is Part of Kroger Opioid Settlement
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250