Cuomo, Lawmakers Hire Outside Counsel to Defend Law Establishing Watchdog for Prosecutors
The state attorney general's office, which would usually appear for the governor and state lawmakers in such litigation, is not representing any of the defendants in the litigation at this time, a spokeswoman confirmed.
November 29, 2018 at 01:29 PM
6 minute read
Gov. Andrew Cuomo and top lawmakers in the state legislature have hired attorneys to defend them in a lawsuit against legislation that will create a special commission to investigate cases of misconduct by the state's prosecutors.
The state attorney general's office, which would usually appear for the governor and state lawmakers in such litigation, is not representing any of the defendants in the litigation at this time, a spokeswoman confirmed.
That shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone who has followed the legislation since it was approved by the state Legislature in June.
After constitutional concerns were raised by the state's district attorneys, Cuomo's office requested a review of the legislation from the attorney general's office before approving the bill. Leslie Dubeck, general counsel to New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, wrote weeks later to Cuomo's office that the legislation would likely not survive judicial review as written.
Cuomo and state lawmakers then agreed to pass changes to the legislation next January addressing some, but not all, of Dubeck's concerns. In what's called a “chapter amendment” Cuomo signed the bill as it was written with a promise from lawmakers to approve those revisions at the next earliest opportunity.
The District Attorneys Association of the State of New York then filed a complaint against Cuomo and legislative leaders in both the State Senate and Assembly in October over the constitutionality of the legislation as it's currently written. The litigation does not account for the changes expected to be passed in January.
DAASNY is represented pro bono in the litigation by Jim Walden and Jacob Gardener from Walden Macht & Haran in Manhattan.
Litigators held a telephone conference with Albany Supreme Court Justice David Weinstein last week on a motion filed by DAASNY for a preliminary injunction against the commission. Attorneys for the defendants in the case were identified at that time.
Cuomo has retained Jim McGuire and Daniel Sullivan, partners at Holwell Shuster & Goldberg in Manhattan; Senate Republican Leader John Flanagan is represented by Michael Hutter, special counsel at Powers & Santola in Albany; Senate Democratic Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins is represented by Benjamin Hill, a solo practitioner in Albany; Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie is represented by Andrew Rossman, Kathleen Sullivan, and Alex Spiro, all partners at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan in Manhattan; and Assembly Republican Leader Brian Kolb is represented by David Morgen, principal at Hinman Straub in Albany.
The State of New York and the Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct, which are also named in the complaint, do not appear to be represented at this time.
Another phone conference is scheduled between the litigants Friday. If no stipulation is reached between the parties, Cuomo and the other defendants will file their answer to the complaint and their opposition to a preliminary injunction against the commission by Dec. 10. A reply brief from DAASNY will be due a week later.
Albany County District Attorney David Soares, the current president of DAASNY, is also a named plaintiff in the lawsuit. He said they remain confident in their case against the legislation.
“As the court considers our motion to halt the formation of the Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct, we remain confident that this poorly crafted and unconstitutional piece of legislation will be invalidated,” Soares said. “The bill violates our State Constitution in multiple ways and is unworkable in its current form.”
The Commission on Prosecutorial Conduct is scheduled to be formed in January, according to the legislation Cuomo signed in August. The 11-member panel will be tasked with reviewing complaints of misconduct by the state's prosecutors and recommending disciplinary actions to Cuomo, who, as governor, has the power to sanction or remove a district attorney from office.
But what the commission will look like in January is unclear. Lawmakers have yet to release language on the amendment they plan to pass in January. Cuomo only broadly outlined what would be modified in his approval message with the bill.
The amendment is expected to change the composition of the commission to address some of Dubeck's constitutional concerns.
The number of appointees to the commission each branch of government will be allowed is expected to shift in favor of the governor, for example. That was to address concerns over the legislature having a majority of the appointments, which would theoretically give them power over district attorneys, who are considered executive officers.
Chief Judge Janet DiFiore will also be allowed to appoint retired judges to the commission, rather than active judges as the original legislation required. There were concerns over tasking active judges with such a role outside their work in judicial office.
Those, among other changes, are expected to cure some of the constitutional concerns expressed by Dubeck and the state's district attorneys, but DAASNY has said it will still mount a challenge to the legislation after the amendment is passed.
It has long argued that lawmakers should, instead, improve the current process for disciplining attorneys in New York. Each Appellate Division has a Grievance Committee that currently reviews complaints of misconduct against lawyers, including district attorneys and their assistants.
Those committees are able to recommend penalties for misconduct, but have been criticized by defense attorney groups for a lack of transparency when it comes to complaints against prosecutors.
Soares said his organization is still willing to work with state lawmakers on ways to improve the current system instead of having a special commission to address complaints of misconduct specifically by the state's prosecutors.
“As we approach the upcoming legislative session, DAASNY remains committed to assisting our lawmakers in creating a better and more transparent grievance system for all attorneys,” Soares said.
READ MORE:
DAs File Constitutional Challenge to NY Prosecutorial Conduct Commission
Cuomo, Lawmakers Agree on Changes to Prosecutorial Misconduct Commission Bill
DAs Plan Constitutional Challenge to Prosecutorial Misconduct Commission
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllYou’re Sure You’ve Looked? The Use of Jackson Affidavits and Efforts to Locate Discovery Materials
Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Plan Suit
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Trial Court's Sidestep of 'Batson' Deprived Defendant of Challenge to Jury Discrimination
- 2Is Your Law Firm Growing Fast Enough? Scale, Consolidation and Competition
- 3Child Custody: The Dangers of 'Rules of Thumb'
- 4The Spectacle of Rudy Giuliani Returns to the SDNY
- 5Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250