Westchester Jury Awards $28M in Physical, Sexual Assault of High School Student
According to Jordan Merson of Merson Law, who represented the plaintiff, the award is the largest handed up by a jury in a sexual and physical assault case in New York state history.
December 03, 2018 at 02:48 PM
3 minute read
A Westchester County jury has awarded $28 million to a former Mount Vernon, New York, student who endured physical assaults from other students and in one incident was taken off campus and sexually assaulted when she was supposed to be on a bus for special-education students.
According to Jordan Merson of Merson Law, who represented the plaintiff, the award is the largest handed up by a jury in a sexual and physical assault case in New York state history.
The plaintiff says a fellow student at Mount Vernon High School sexually assaulted her at his home in December 2011 while giving her a ride home from school.
The victim was 13 years old at the time of the sexual assault and her cognitive abilities were at a first-grade level, Merson said.
Then, in March 2012, the plaintiff was brutally beaten in a locker room by three female students, an attack that caused her to suffer a traumatic brain injury and a concussion.
Following a trial lasting about three weeks, a jury of five women and one man found that the victim had been bullied and that the Mount Vernon school district was negligent in both the sexual assault and the locker room beating. The jury assigned 99 percent of the fault to the school district and 1 percent of the fault to Nyree Norman, one of the three students involved in the locker room beating.
The jury award broke down to $8 million for past pain and suffering and $20 million for future pain and suffering. Merson said his client has lasting psychological scars from the attacks.
“She will be living with this for the rest of her life,” Merson said.
Richard Oleson, a partner at O'Connor McGuinness Conte Doyle Oleson Watson & Loftus, and Kenneth Haldenstein, an associate with the firm, represented the school district. They did not respond to requests for comment.
In addition to Merson, the plaintiff and her family were represented by Andrew Buzin of Buzin Law. Merson said that he and Buzin were able to win over the jury by highlighting the school district's negligence in the case.
They called as their first witness the director of the school's special education program when the attacks occurred, who testified that the plaintiff was not on a bus for special-education students when she should have been.
Additionally, the locker room attack occurred a few days after an off-campus altercation with the three assailants. Following the off-campus incident, the plaintiff's relatives complained to school officials and the special education director told subordinates to keep close watch.
“This wasn't just one error—this was many, many many errors,” Merson said. “The evidence was overwhelming.”
Read more:
Complaint Over Flawed Sex-Offender Housing Assistance Is Rejected by NY Court of Appeals
The New York Court of Appeals Gets It Wrong on Campus Sex Abuse
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCaught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
8 minute readGift and Estate Tax Opportunities and Potential Traps in 2025 for Our New York High Net Worth Clients
7 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Relaxing Penalties on Discovery Noncompliance Allows Criminal Cases to Get Decided on Merit
- 2Reviewing Judge Merchan's Unconditional Discharge
- 3With New Civil Jury Selection Rule, Litigants Should Carefully Weigh Waiver Risks
- 4Young Lawyers Become Old(er) Lawyers
- 5Caught In the In Between: A Legal Roadmap for the Sandwich Generation
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250