On Becoming Ruth Bader Ginsburg
The best part of the book deals with this portion of Ginsburg's career, in the 1970s, when she was in a state of “becoming,” making her first huge mark on the legal profession.
December 04, 2018 at 02:24 PM
7 minute read
Ruth Bader Ginsburg: A Life
By Jane Sherron De Hart
Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 752 pages, $35
Jane Sherron De Hart's new biography of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg brings to mind Emerson's 1841 essay, “Self Reliance,” in which he famously admonished: “Don't go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail.” Well-researched and authoritative, the book chronicles the life, career and significance of the second woman to ever serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, whose impatience with sexism and injustice has broken barriers since her law school days in the late 1950s. In the years to come, when readers examine the emergence of the first critical mass of important women in the legal profession, this book will help them understand the trail left by Ginsburg.
The author is a professor emerita of history at the University of California (Santa Barbara), who has devoted her academic career to feminist and gender legal history. In 1990, she published (with Donald G. Mathews) the award-winning book, Sex, Gender, and the Politics of Sex: A State and a Nation. Dating back to the 1960s, her distinguished academic career has prepared her well to write the story of Ginsburg, whose own emergence as an academic and a lawyer had its genesis in the same time period. As such, she is able to write with the experience, perspective and depth that her subject deserves.
Over 15 years in the making, the book was originally supposed to focus on Ginsburg's days in the 1970s as a civil rights litigator. The justice granted generous access to the archives of her 1970s litigation files and, in the early 2000s, provided one-half dozen interviews to the author.
In 2008, however, a California wildfire destroyed much of the author's research and writing on the book. Undeterred, she pressed ahead and, over time, transformed the book into the first full-length Ginsburg biography, albeit an unauthorized one. Ginsburg's authorized biographers, Mary Hartnett and Wendy Williams, who assisted the justice in preparing the 2016 book of her selected writings, entitled My Own Words, are still writing their “authorized biography.”
Born in Brooklyn in 1933, Ginsburg's egalitarian proclivities were instilled early by her mother, Celia Bader, who, despite excellent grades, did not further her own education because her parents instead decided to send her brother to college. Celia admired strong, independent-minded women, such as Eleanor Roosevelt, and urged her daughter to pursue a teaching career. Ginsburg has reflected that her mother “was the strongest and bravest person I have ever known.”
On the eve of Ginsburg's graduation from James Madison High School, her mother died of cancer. Ginsburg's grief at her mother's death was heightened by the exclusion she felt when, sitting Shivah, the women were not counted in forming a minyan in saying prayers for the dead. According to the author, “the emotions inspired by the incident lingered, becoming a turning point in [Ginsburg's] decision to become a secular Jew.”
Ginsburg attended Cornell University, earning scholarships to cover her tuition. Like other elite colleges, Cornell in the 1950s was not a welcoming place for Jews, who were marginalized socially. Moreover, it was not fashionable for the women students “to be seen reading and studying.” A “dedicated student” who majored in government, Ginsburg thus “found out-of-the-way classrooms, specialized libraries, and even empty bathrooms in campus buildings where she could work without being seen.” During her Cornell tenure, Ginsburg's scholarship was influenced by Vladimir Nabakov, who taught European literature, and Robert Cushman, a constitutional law expert.
At Cornell, Ginsburg met her husband, Martin, an “ebullient, witty, and gregarious” son of a department store vice president from Rockville Centre. The couple married in June 1954, soon after her graduation. By all accounts, they enjoyed a remarkable marriage, which lasted until Martin's 2010 death. One of the strengths of the book is the author's descriptions of the myriad of ways in which Martin, who became a distinguished tax partner at Weil Gotschal & Manges, supported and celebrated his wife's legal career.
Another strength of the book is the author's chronicling of the sexism suffered by Ginsburg in law school in the late 1950s and her early years in the legal profession in the 1960s. Despite graduating at the top of her class from Columbia Law School, Ginsburg was unable to find a job or clerkship.
With the assistance of Professor Gerald Gunther, however, Ginsburg was eventually hired by a reluctant Judge Edmund Palmieri who, during her two years working in his chambers, became impressed by her work ethic, incisive analysis, competence, loyalty, and charm. Judge Palmieri, who served on the federal bench for 35 years, considered Ginsburg to be one of his top proteges.
Following her clerkship, Ginsburg went into academia, serving as a law professor specializing in civil procedure at Rutgers and Columbia.
In the late 1960s, however, Ginsburg developed another specialty in the emerging area of gender equality. By 1970, she had co-founded the “Women's Rights Law Reporter,” the first legal journal of its kind. By 1972, she had co-founded the “Women's Rights Project” at the ACLU, which participated in hundreds of gender equality cases. From this post, Ginsburg became an accomplished legal strategist and appellate advocate, arguing six sex discrimination cases before the Supreme Court.
The best part of the book deals with this portion of Ginsburg's career, in the 1970s, when she was in a state of “becoming,” making her first huge mark on the legal profession.
In the late 1970s, Ginsburg aspired to become a federal judge. The Second Circuit screening panel rejected her as too inexperienced. In 1980, however, she obtained an appointment to the D.C. Circuit. There, she established a record as a centrist. As adroitly observed by the author, nowhere was this more in evidence than in 1984, when she sided in measured prose with conservatives such as Antonin Scalia, Kenneth Starr and Robert Bork in rejecting en banc review in Dronenburg v. Zech, a case which had rejected a gay naval officer's claim to a constitutional right to privacy.
The last 244 pages deal with Ginsburg's 25-year tenure on the Supreme Court. Predictably, the author focuses much of this portion of the book on Ginsburg's significant civil rights decisions involving gender equality, women's reproductive rights, voting rights and marriage equality. It is written with the care and balance needed for a mass audience readership. For lawyers and scholars, the 110 pages of endnotes provide much sustenance.
As the book aptly describes, Ginsburg has over the past eight years finally settled into a state of “being,” as the senior justice of the liberal wing of the court following the 2010 retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens. Her signature dissents have become as powerful and memorable as any of her majority opinions. Following no one else's path, she has blazed her own trail. In the words of Dag Hammarskjold, its motto is: “Never for the sake of peace and quiet deny your convictions.”
Jeffrey M. Winn is a management liability attorney for the Chubb Group, a global insurer, and is a member of and the secretary to the executive committee of the New York City Bar Association.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'We Learn Much From the Court's Mistakes': Law Journal Review of 'The Worst Supreme Court Decisions, Ever!'
6 minute read'Midnight in Moscow': A Memoir From the Front Lines of Russia's War Against the West
9 minute read'There Are Heroes in Every Story': Review of 'The Eight: The Lemmon Slave Case and the Fight for Freedom'
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250