Jury Delivers $85M Verdict to Former New York Times Columnist Hit by Tour Bus
A Manhattan Supreme Court jury has awarded an $85 million verdict to a former New York Times “Vows” columnist who was hit and severely injured by a double-decker tour bus in 2015.
December 06, 2018 at 06:13 PM
4 minute read
A Manhattan Supreme Court jury has awarded an $85 million verdict to a former New York Times “Vows” columnist who was hit and severely injured by a double-decker tour bus in 2015.
According to a verdict sheet from the trial, which was held before Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Barbara Jaffe, the jurors on Tuesday awarded $45 million to the injured writer, Devan Sipher, for his past pain and suffering and $40 million for future pain and suffering.
But after the six-person jury delivered the verdict against Gray Line New York Tours bus company and other defendants, the lawyers for each side quickly settled for a lower amount that has not been disclosed, according to Howard Hershenhorn, the attorney for Sipher.
In a phone interview Thursday, Hershenhorn said that he was “100 percent sure” that the $85 million verdict would have been significantly reduced under remittitur principles by either the trial judge or the Appellate Division, First Department, and that therefore the settlement made sense.
“There's been no precedent for a verdict that large” in an auto injury case, Hershenhorn said, “and certainly no precedent to sustain such a verdict once reviewed, and so we resolved the case for what we believe is the most money anyone could get for those injuries.”
Hershenhorn would not disclose information about the settlement amount.
Donald Derrico, a lawyer for the defendants in the suit—which included Gray Line New York Tours Inc., Twin America LLC and Calvin Wright, the bus driver involved—did not return a call seeking comment.
The jury rendered the damages verdict after about three hours of deliberations, Hershenhorn said, and he and his team were able to speak with five of the six jurors posttrial, he said.
Based on the juror interviews, Hershenhorn said that a key to getting a large and fast-delivered verdict had been putting on a cast of medical experts—eight in all—who had impressed the jurors with their knowledge of Sipher's numerous injuries and long-lasting medical problems.
“The jurors were extremely impressed by the quality of the expert testimony,” Hershenhorn said. “I think we had great experts who really understood the medicine and the specific facts in this case—the medicine involved in these injuries—and had reviewed the medical records.”
Hershenhorn said that both sides of the case had stipulated, before the verdict, to $2.5 million as the amount for Sipher's economic losses, including lost wages and future medical expenses.
During the accident, which happened in Manhattan's West Village in July 2015, Sipher, now 54, had his left leg and foot partially crushed underneath the bus, and he was dragged along as well, Hershenhorn said.
He has since had 10 surgeries on his leg and foot, and one surgery on his right shoulder, the lawyer said.
His specific injuries included artery and vein injuries and neurological injuries, and Sipher—who had been a regular runner—is now required to wear a brace on his left foot for the rest of his life, Hershenhorn said.
In addition, he is on painkiller medication for the foreseeable future, he added.
Hershenhorn, a partner at personal injury firm Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf said that the two sides had litigated for years over liability—through discovery and depositions—after the lawsuit was filed in 2015.
He said that the defense, then led by a law firm different than Derrico's—which only took over the case this year—put forward an argument that the accident was Sipher's fault for walking into the bus. But eventually, the plaintiff's side produced a video from city street cameras that showed Sipher was hit while legally walking in a crosswalk, Hershenhorn said, adding that the bus company driver, Wright, was also fired at some point.
Sipher, who has also published two novels, was gratified by the verdict, Hershenhorn said.
“Since the accident, he's become an advocate for street safety, bicyclist and pedestrian safety in New York,” the attorney said. “His reaction [to the verdict] was that he is hoping that the enormity of the verdict will tell bus company and other transportation companies that they have to do a much better job training their drivers and abiding by the law.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJustice Marguerite Grays Elevated to Co-Chair Panel That Advises on Commercial Division
Distressed M&A: Safe Harbor Protection Extends to Overarching Transfer
Trending Stories
- 1Midsize Firm Bressler Amery Absorbs Austin Boutique, Gaining Four Lawyers
- 2Bill Would Allow Californians to Sue Big Oil for Climate-Linked Wildfires, Floods
- 3LinkedIn Suit Says Millions of Profiles Scraped by Singapore Firm’s Fake Accounts
- 4Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Lawsuit Over FBI Raid at Wrong House
- 5What It Takes to Connect With Millennial Jurors
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250