SDNY Prosecutors Urge 'Substantial' Prison Time for Michael Cohen
Prosecutors from the Manhattan U.S. Attorney's office acknowledged Cohen's help, but strongly urged the court not to mistake Cohen's efforts for those of a traditional cooperator.
December 07, 2018 at 05:00 PM
5 minute read
Prosecutors with the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York asked U.S. District Judge William Pauley III Friday to sentence Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, to a “substantial term of imprisonment,” to be tempered only slightly by Cohen's willingness to talk to members of the Special Counsel Robert Mueller III's team.
In their sentencing submission, prosecutors from Manhattan U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman's office acknowledged Cohen's help, but strongly urged the court not to mistake Cohen's efforts for those of a traditional cooperator. The document was signed by Deputy U.S. Attorney Robert Khuzami, who is piloting the case for the Southern District as Berman recused himself from the matter.
Read the memo:
“Cohen did provide information to law enforcement, including information that assisted the Special Counsel's Office … in ongoing matters, as described in the SCO's memorandum to the Court, and the Office agrees that this is a factor to be considered by the Court pursuant,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Nicole Roos wrote for the government. “But Cohen's description of those efforts is overstated in some respects and incomplete in others.”
The government noted that sentencing guidelines for the eight counts he pleaded guilty to in the Southern District earlier this year, including campaign finance violations, suggested a sentence of 51 to 63 months in prison. In a footnote, the memo said the U.S. Probation Office recommended a term of 42 months.
“This range reflects Cohen's extensive, deliberate, and serious criminal conduct, and this Office submits that a substantial prison term is required to vindicate the purposes and principles of sentencing,” Roos wrote. “And while the Office agrees that Cohen should receive credit for his assistance in the SCO investigation, that credit should not approximate the credit a traditional cooperating witness would receive, given, among other reasons, Cohen's affirmative decision not to become one.”
In a separate filing, attorneys with Mueller's office struck a decidedly softer tone. Nothing Cohen's cooperative efforts, noting that despite the severity of his crime of lying to Congress, Cohen “has taken significant steps to mitigate his criminal conduct.”
“Cohen's decision not only to admit to his prior false statements in proffer sessions with the Government, but to plead guilty to his criminal conduct in open court, demonstrates that Cohen has taken responsibility for his wrongdoing and is willing to face the consequences,” prosecutor's with the Special Counsel's office said in its filing.
A spokesman for Cohen provided no comment on the record when asked.
Both Manhattan and Special Counsel prosecutors were ordered to file their sentencing memos by 5 p.m. Friday. Cohen's sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 12, on two separate guilty pleas he entered into in recent months.
Cohen's plea dealing began back in April, when federal agents in New York executed a search warrant on Cohen's offices and home. The president's former attorney initially took an adversarial stance towards the government's investigations. Cohen and his attorneys with McDermott, Will & Emery quickly fought to keep federal investigators in Manhattan from having direct access to the seized goods. Instead, U.S. District Judge Kimba Wood oversaw a months-long privilege review process overseen by Bracewell partner and former federal judge Barbara Jones.
The process, which involves attorneys for the president and the Trump Organization, ultimately resulted in the vast majority of the material seized being turned over the government. As the process unfolded, Cohen's tune began to change. First in media reports and later during an interview with ABC News, Cohen indicated his priorities were shifting away from the sentiment that he'd take a bullet for Trump.
Around the same time, Cohen was changing legal teams—and strategies. The attorneys at McDermott departed, and Petrillo Klein & Boxer name attorney Guy Petrillo, a former federal prosecutor in Manhattan, took over.
Soon, Cohen was meeting with federal prosecutors connected with the Special Counsel's office, according to Cohen's Dec. 5 sentencing filing. Before entering into his first plea, Cohen met seven times with SCO personnel, according to the filing.
On Aug. 21, Cohen pleaded guilty to eight counts, including tax evasion and federal campaign finance violations. The court documents detail Cohen's efforts to silence two women through pay-off schemes, to keep their stories about extra-marital sexual affairs with Trump from going public. The then-presidential candidate is heavily inculpated throughout the filings.
In late November, Cohen was back in court with another plea. This time, the president's former attorney and fixer pleaded guilty to a single count of lying to Congress about the status of plans to build a Trump-branded building in Moscow in the midst of the 2016 presidential election. According to Cohen's sentencing submission, discussions about his second plea began even before the first occurred, during those seven conversations with the SCO “based in part on information that he voluntarily provided … in meetings governed by a limited-use immunity proffer agreement.”
Cohen argued that his substantial cooperation, with both federal and New York State authorities, and his willingness to do so should save him from facing time behind bars.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'You Became a Corrupt Politician': Judge Gives Prison Time to Former Sen. Robert Menendez for Corruption Conviction
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250