Widow of Late Brooklyn DA Kenneth Thompson Pursuing Med Mal Suit Over His Death
The late Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson's widow, who has clashed with the deceased DA's relatives in court over dividing his estate, is in another court battle with Mount Sinai Hospital and other defendants alleging that they failed to timely diagnose his colorectal cancer.
December 14, 2018 at 01:39 PM
4 minute read
The late Brooklyn District Attorney Kenneth Thompson's widow, who has clashed with the deceased DA's relatives in court over dividing his estate, is in another court battle with Mount Sinai Hospital and other defendants alleging that they failed to timely diagnose his colorectal cancer.
And this week, the defendants in the medical malpractice suit filed to move the suit out of Brooklyn, citing Thompson's accomplishments during his abbreviated tenure as district attorney of New York City's most populous borough, including the launch of his office's “Begin Again” warrant clearance program, under which about 2,400 warrants have been cleared.
Thompson died in office in October 2016 at the age of 50. He was diagnosed with colorectal cancer about six months prior to his death and the cancer metastasized and spread to his brain within a few months of the diagnosis.
Lu-Shawn Thompson, who last year relinquished her rights to her late husband's estate and left her share to the couple's two children, alleges in the med mal suit against Mount Sinai, Carnegie Hill Endoscopy, Fifth Avenue GI and a physician who treated Kenneth Thompson that his death was preventable had medical professionals caught the cancer in time.
“He did everything his doctors asked of him and yet, he died because his doctors did not comport with accepted medical practice,” the widow alleges in her suit, which was filed in July. She is represented by Jordan Merson of Merson Law.
The defendants, represented by attorneys from Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker and Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan, have responded in court papers that Kenneth Thompson's death should be attributable to his own conduct.
They also argued that it may be difficult for them to get a fair trial in a locale where the deceased “pioneered judicial reform.”
Under Kenneth Thompson, efforts by the Brooklyn DA's office to investigate questionable convictions and push for exoneration of the wrongfully accused has attracted the attention of prosecutors and criminal justice reformers around the country.
To bolster their case, the defendants included in their exhibits the 2013 general election results, in which Kenneth Thompson received 235,666 votes and unseated six-term Brooklyn DA Charles “Joe” Hynes, who received just shy of 80,000 votes that year.
Merson did not respond to a request for comment on the motion for change of venue.
Lu-Shawn Thompson has also battled in court with her late husband's relatives over the validity of his final will, which left everything to his wife and kids and which he signed in his final months.
A previous version of the will, which Kenneth Thompson signed in 2008, left $900,000 to Clara Thompson, Kenneth Thompson's mother, and other relatives. His mother argues that her son signed the final will after the cancer had spread to his brain and was in a weakened mental state.
In August, Acting Brooklyn Surrogate's Court Judge John Ingram vacated the probate for the final will, finding that the significant differences between the two wills, as well as other factors that arose in the hotly contested battle over Kenneth Thompson's estate, cast doubt on the validity of the final will.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMore Big Law Firms Rush to Match Associate Bonuses, While Some Offer Potential for Even More
Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250