Paul Weiss Vows to 'Do Better' After Partner Promotions Stir Diversity Debate
Online reaction to the firm's starkly male-dominated partner promotions photo was swift—especially from in-house counsel—but it's not just Paul Weiss facing scrutiny.
December 18, 2018 at 05:44 PM
7 minute read
They say a picture is worth 1,000 words, and Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison has gotten an earful over one showing its latest partner promotions.
The firm's now-deleted post on Linkedin this month announcing its new partner class of 12 attorneys—an image dominated by white men and showing only one (white) woman in the lower right corner—generated a burst of criticism on social media, including by some general counsel.
The comments highlight how promotion announcements of law firms are increasingly a hot topic of discussion by some general counsel, who may be assessing new partner classes to help make hiring decisions—and offering their own sometimes critical feedback.
For Paul Weiss' new partner announcement, the comments on LinkedIn came swiftly. One lawyer posted that he was inspired to require a check of diversity records of all service providers as a “condition of continued relationships,” while other in-house counsel said they were “dismayed by the homogeneity of this set of new partners” and called the announcement “very disappointing.” The firm appeared to have deleted the post on Tuesday.
Michelle Fang, chief legal officer at car-sharing company Turo, also spoke up, writing “GCs like me that hire law firms for bet-the-company litigation and other commercial or corporate matters want to see announcements” showing diverse new partners. She noted Cravath, Swaine & Moore's all-female new partner class of three attorneys.
In an interview, Fang said this is not just about Paul Weiss. Fang, whose company is not a firm client, said she spoke up about the Paul Weiss announcement because its new partner photo montage was so starkly nondiverse, but that other law firms are in a similar boat. “Probably other firms will look pretty similar,” she said.
Indeed, the Diversity & Flexibility Alliance, which tracks promotions by large firms, said last year in its most recently available report that women made up 38.1 percent of newly promoted partners—up from 37 percent the year before—while men accounted for 61.9 percent of promotions. The group found that the figure was moving “at a glacial pace.”
Several other elite firms promoted few, if any, women this year. Gunderson Dettmer Stough Villeneuve Franklin & Hachigian just announced an all-male new partner class of five. Davis Polk & Wardwell's new partner class, announced in July, includes seven men promoted to partner and one woman who rejoined the firm from the U.S. Attorney's office. Proskauer Rose promoted 11 new partners, including only two women.
Some corporate counsel point to even lower levels of ethnic and racial diversity in law firm promotions.
|'Will Not Be Repeated'
In a statement to ALM, Brad Karp, Paul Weiss chairman, said, “We certainly can—and will—do better. I regret the gender and racial imbalance in our newly elected partnership class (one woman, one Latino, one LGBTQ partner, only 25 percent diverse), which resulted from an idiosyncratic demographic pool and which I can assure you will not be repeated.”
“We intend to continue to play a leadership role in diversity in terms of race, gender and sexual orientation. We look forward to being judged not by our words, but by our results, in the years to come,” Karp said. “There is no more important issue to me (and the firm's leadership) than diversity and it is critical to me that Paul Weiss maintain its historic leadership role as a firm that champions diversity in terms of race, gender and sexual orientation.”
Karp pointed out the firm's history in hiring and promoting diverse lawyers, noting Paul Weiss was the first major New York law firm to hire an African-American male associate and female associate, in the 1940s; the first major New York law firm to elect a female partner, in the 1940s; and the first major New York firm to have a diversity of religious beliefs among its partners.
Karp also noted that about one-third of the firm's partnership are diverse, including women, people of color and LGBTQ partners, and the firm's current first-year class is 55 percent women and 47 percent racially diverse and LGBTQ. Paul Weiss has also been ranked No. 1 by the American Lawyer Diversity Scorecard, he noted.
A woman, Valerie Radwaner, serves as the firm's deputy chair, and women lead more than 30 percent of its practice groups and departments, he said. “Our percentage of female, African-American and LGBTQ partners and associates greatly exceeds the average for New York and U.S. law firms,” Karp said. “It would be unfortunate and disappointing if an idiosyncratic demographic pool in one particular year would erase the firm's diversity achievements over the past 75 years.”
Karp intends to address the firm's diversity values further during the firm's next town hall meeting with associates, scheduled in January.
For his part, Davis Polk managing partner Tom Reid said in a statement that, “Diversity is a constant, generational challenge that we address seriously and sincerely. One of the reasons we adhere to a lockstep compensation structure is that it eliminates any gender- and diversity-based pay inequities.”
A Proskauer spokeswoman said the firm's chairman, Joseph Leccese, was not immediately available to comment. Gunderson representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
|'Vote With Our Pocketbooks'
Some corporate counsel say they are paying more attention to law firms' promotion announcements. “We want to see announcements that show diversity in the new partner class,” Fang said in an interview.
She said corporate counsel can make an impact on diversity when they choose law firms. ”I really am trying to be thoughtful about our resources and how I deploy them. It's extremely important that we vote with our pocketbooks” and “reward firms that are championing diversity and inclusion in how they promote and hire people,” Fang said. “It's not a token gesture.”
To be clear, Fang said, attorneys shouldn't get ahead “only because they're women or people of color. It is diversity and inclusion and quality. It is the best people. You are going to find the best people of every race and every gender. White males don't have a monopoly on talent.”
Fang also spoke on a common complaint among some firms—that it's difficult to build a diverse new partner class due to a pipeline challenge. “What is going on at that firm that people are opting out of the partnership track?” she asked. “There are best practices to help people in the pipeline.”
Jennifer Chaloemtiarana, general counsel and chief compliance officer of health care navigation company Castlight, said she doesn't necessarily look at partner announcements alone, “but they are a sign of how the firm is handling diversity in the more junior ranks.”
“The partner announcement is merely the outcome of the work they have done leading up to that: Were they diverse in their hiring? In their promotions? In the 'choice' work they were giving to associates? By the time they get to partner promotions, it is basically too late,” she said.
Another in-house lawyer, Sangeetha Raghunathan, general counsel of crowd-funding platform Indiegogo, said she recently checked the promotion announcements of the firms her company works with—with some disappointing results.
The company's outside counsel guidelines encourage firms to staff cases with a diverse range of attorneys, she added.
Raghunathan said she plans to contact the firms she works with to encourage them to promote diversity in their firms, as part of an ongoing discussion of outside counsel guidelines. Law firm promotion announcements are now another factor to consider when hiring firms, she added.
“I know they're coming from a good place. It's a good reminder that their clients actually read these things and pay attention,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'So Many Firms' Have Yet to Announce Associate Bonuses, Underlining Big Law's Uneven Approach
5 minute readGovernment Attorneys Are Flooding the Job Market, But Is There Room in Big Law?
4 minute readT14 Sees Black, Hispanic Law Student Representation Decline Following End of Affirmative Action
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.