A Decade After Madoff's Fall, Boies Schiller's Matthew Schwartz Recalls the 'Amazing,' 'Horrible' Story
The former Manhattan federal prosecutor who oversaw the government's investigation into Madoff's Ponzi scheme speaks about enforcement changes, and what he brought with him to private practice from the experience.
December 26, 2018 at 01:38 PM
4 minute read
Ten years ago, financier Bernard Madoff was arrested and charged with securities fraud. Soon, the world would learn Madoff had orchestrated the largest Ponzi scheme in history. A year and a half later, he pleaded guilty to a host of charges and was sentenced to 150 years in prison.
Boies Schiller Flexner partner Matthew Schwartz led federal prosecutors' investigation into Madoff for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, where he was an assistant U.S. attorney for a decade before joining Boies Schiller in 2015.
Schwartz spoke with the New York Law Journal about his reflections on the anniversary.
Q: The Madoff story remains a point of interest even today—it must have been interesting seeing it adapted for television.
A: It's an amazing story—a horrible story, of course. He got the best of so many people for so long. But a pretty remarkable story.
Ponzi schemes are usually fairly short-lived because they by necessity have to keep growing or they die, and he was able to keep going for 40 years, and billions of dollars and tens of thousands of victims, and through financial crises like market crashes and runs on the bank. All the sorts of things that usually spell the end for Ponzi schemes, they were just bumps in the road for him, until in a lot of ways he was another victim of the financial crisis and he just couldn't sustain it any longer.
It's a really remarkable story. Makes sense to make a movie out of it.
Q: Are you surprised the recovery efforts have managed to continue on for a decade?
A: If 10 years ago you had asked me to bet, will the asset recovery effort still be going strong, 10 years later, rather than just tying up loose ends? I probably would have been surprised by that.
But then again, if you asked me whether the recovery effort would have recovered more than $17 billion already of possibly $20 billion in stolen principle, I definitely would have been surprised by that. It's sort of fitting and of course it's enormously complex, for the largest and longest-running fraud of all time, that it should take so long to unravel.
Q: What have some of the effects been on white-collar enforcement after Madoff?
A: I think that it's interesting to see that there's been so much systemic change as a result of one case, even such a big one. In particular, the SEC has changed and reformed itself in a number of ways, as a direct result of the failure to stop the Madoff fraud.
It has focused in a new way on investor education. It has changed its coordination between the exam staff and the enforcement staff. It has created a robust whistleblower program. These things and others are traceable almost directly to the end of the failure to catch the Madoff plot.
Q: What are some of the things from the Madoff case you've taken with you into private practice?
A: Obviously the experience working on the team of prosecutors and law enforcement agents that unraveled that fraud, both from a law enforcement, putting-people-in-jail perspective and an asset recovery perspective, those were great experiences. I bring things to my life on the other side every day from those great experiences.
One thing that has become more important to me on this side of things is understanding the tools that are available to the government in really complicated asset recovery cases. The Madoff case has been one of the most successful asset recovery efforts of all time, both between the trustee's recovery of more than $10 billion and the government recovery of another $4 billion through a whole array of means. Not just the sort of typical criminal forfeitures following conviction, but also through civil forfeitures and enforcement of other statutes against, for example, the banks, as we did when we entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with Madoff's primary bank.
And that focus on recovering assets for victims of crime has been very important to me in my practice, today.
Related:
Madoff and Conceptual Art Mix in Nonprofit Copyright Suit
Settlement With Madoff Sons' Estates Worth $23M
Partner in Boies' SDNY Alumni Team Moves to Willkie Farr
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllOrrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Ephemeral Messaging Going Into 2025:The Messages May Vanish But Not The Preservation Obligations
5 minute readSEC Official Hints at More Restraint With Industry Bars, Less With Wells Meetings
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1DOT Moves to Roll Back Emissions Rules, Eliminate DEI Programs
- 2No Injury: Despite Proven Claims, Antitrust Suit Fails
- 3Miami-Dade Litigation Over $1.7 Million Brazilian Sugar Deal Faces Turning Point
- 4Trump Ordered by UK Court to Pay Legal Bill Within 28 Days
- 5$19.1M Verdict: 'Most Accurate Settlement Demand I Ever Made'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250