Groups Criticize Organized Crime Reference to Janet DiFiore
The reference to organized crime may arguably have a multitude of contexts, however, the characterization has been historically and quite regrettably attached to the Italian American community.
December 27, 2018 at 12:20 PM
4 minute read
Now that the holiday season envelops us collectively, it is time to pause and reflect on what has occurred over the past year and consider that for which we are grateful.
The legal community in the state continues to be a standard bearer for the sanctity of the Rule of Law, which serves as a counter-weight to the tumult of our times. Important to the legal system, its mission statement and its laudable pursuits, is the partnership of the Judiciary, the bar and the people who work in the courts and provide structural support to the Judicial institutions.
At the helm is our chief judge, who has provided strong leadership and compassion for the court's constituent groups. She has been determined in guiding the courts by deploying her “excellence initiative” and nurturing many other innovative programs.
Like any other complex system, however, there are less than boundless resources to tap and there is never a dearth of competing interests at play for the limited resources. In that backdrop, it is not unexpected that there are legitimate labor disputes that will surface including staffing and personnel issues in our courts. Moreover, our legal system is not immune from the tensions that sometimes arise between management and labor. Notwithstanding, there is no place in this very legitimate discussion for ugly rhetoric and ethnic insult.
It is no secret that the chief judge of the New York State Court of Appeals, Janet DiFiore, is a highly-respected professional woman and Jurist of Italian-American Heritage.
The presidents of the New York State Court Officers Association and the Supreme Court Officers Association and their rank and file have equated the Office of Court Administration with an “Organized Crime Association.”
The reference to organized crime may arguably have a multitude of contexts, however, the characterization has been historically and quite regrettably attached to the Italian American community. The Court Officers' Union did not originate the reference but certainly has perpetuated the insulting nature of it.
It is not a stretch to surmise, that the chief judge, the perceived (management) antagonist to the union (labor) in this scenario, was the intended target of the offensive slur. Accordingly, after the passage of time and the opportunity for sober reflection, the Confederation of Columbian Lawyer Associations is now expressing an opinion about this sensitive subject. The confederation is an organization comprised of approximately 1,500 attorneys and jurists, men and women, of both Italian-American and non-Italian ancestry, who are affiliated with Columbian Lawyers groups dispersed throughout nine of New York State's counties.
Chief Judge DiFiore is a proud Columbian lawyer. While some may contend that the organized crime reference was not intended to besmirch the ethnicity of the chief judge and the Italian-American community here in New York State, the net effect of its utterance was that of an ethnic slur.
Perhaps the approach of the holiday season and the turn of another calendar year presents a ripe opportunity for those who speak with passion for their cause to tone down their rhetoric and choose their words and references more carefully, leading aspirationally to an overall more constructive discourse.
Far too much incivility exists on a national level. The legal community of New York State deserves much better.
Confederation of Columbian Lawyer Associations
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAttorney Responds to Outten & Golden Managing Partner's Letter on Dropped Client
3 minute readLetter to the Editor: Law Journal Used Misleading Photo for Article on Election Observers
1 minute readNYC's Administrative Court's to Publish Some Rulings in the New York Law Journal Is Welcomed. But It Should Go Further
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250