NY Grievance Committee Applies to Suspend 2,601 Attorneys in State's Third Dept.
The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Appellate Division, Third Department gave notice on Monday that those attorneys—including 116 with addresses in New York—have until the end of the day on April 5 to file papers explaining why they shouldn't be suspended.
January 07, 2019 at 11:55 AM
2 minute read
One of the state's attorney grievance committees has applied for an order to suspend 2,601 attorneys from practicing law in New York after they allegedly failed to register for at least four years.
The Attorney Grievance Committee for the Appellate Division, Third Department gave notice on Monday that those attorneys—including 116 with addresses in New York—have until the end of the day on April 5 to file papers explaining why they shouldn't be suspended.
The other 2,485 attorneys named by the department had previously provided addresses to the Office of Court Administration that were either outside New York, but within the U.S., or in another country.
Attorneys are required to file with the committee on a biennial basis, and those served notice on Monday failed to do so at least twice.
An Order to Show Cause was signed by Presiding Justice Elizabeth Garry of the Third Department two weeks ago that alleged all 2,601 attorneys had filed to file their registrations and pay the associated fees.
Samuel Younger, the chief management analyst for the Office of Court Administration Attorney Registration Unit, wrote in an affidavit that those attorneys had not responded to multiple notices the office sent about their registration. If an attorney doesn't send back the biennial registration form, the unit will mail up to two additional notices reminding them to register.
The Third Department has posted a list of the attorneys on their website who have allegedly failed to register and remain delinquent on their registration. If an attorney seeks to file papers opposing their suspension, they can do so with the Clerk of the Appellate Division, P.O. Box 7288, Capital Station, Albany, NY 12224.
Attorneys outside New York at risk of suspension were listed at addresses from several states within the U.S., though many appeared to be from New Jersey, California, Texas, and Connecticut.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBen & Jerry’s Accuses Corporate Parent of ‘Silencing’ Support for Palestinian Rights
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1The Distribution of Dangerous Products Via Online Marketplaces
- 2The Products Liability Case Against Tianeptine: The Deadly ‘Dietary Supplement’ Found at Your Local Store
- 3The Evolving Landscape of Joint and Several Liability in Pa.: A Post-'Spencer' Analysis
- 4A Deep Dive Into the Product-Line Exception in Pennsylvania
- 5When Personal Injury and Family Law Collide
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250