Book Review—The Constitution: Unplugged
In this extremely timely book, Prof. Brettschneider reminds us that, in order for our government to work as it was meant to, each branch—Executive, Legislative and Judicial—must work with the other.
January 08, 2019 at 02:25 PM
6 minute read
'The Oath and the Office: A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents' Corey Brettschneider W.W. Norton & Co. 274 pages, $22.95
When you pick up a book, you may wonder what inspired the writer to write about his subject. When you pick up Corey Brettschneider's latest offering, though, his subtitle “A Guide to the Constitution for Future Presidents” likely answers your question. Given the front page headlines of every single day since our president hit the campaign trail, one doesn't have to interview Prof. Brettschneider, a professor of Constitutional Law at both Brown University and Fordham Law School, to know everything there is to know about it: that it is critical for an elected president to know with precision the obligations and, more important here, the limitations on what he can and should do consistent with the oath of office he has taken, that is, to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution …” It is unlikely that President Trump has read this book—although he certainly should. Let's hope he does, but importantly, let's hope the populace—lawyers and non-lawyers alike and whether Trump supporters or not—reads this book to better understand our Constitutional rights so that they are not eroded.
In this extremely timely book, Prof. Brettschneider reminds us that, in order for our government to work as it was meant to, each branch—Executive, Legislative and Judicial—must work with the other. Checks and balances are built in to our system of government so that no one person or group can act alone. “The [presidential] oath requires that the president uphold the Constitution—even parts which he or she disagrees with.” Such is the contract a president makes with the American people. Alexander Hamilton expressed his concern that a president might actually undermine the values of the Constitution in order to win popular support; the Framers attempted to guard against such action. Thus, James Madison argued, even if a president were to become a tyrant catering to the worst prejudices of the populace, people cannot be stripped of those Constitutionally-mandated rights. An important reminder.
To be sure, a president—don't we know it—can overstep his authority. He can issue executive orders which exceed what he is permitted to do; he can ignore the Constitutional limitations on his authority. He can also act technically legally, yet obstruct the very tenets of our system at the same time. Perhaps nothing, in history, demonstrated that better than Richard Nixon's “Saturday Night Massacre”—he got rid of the problem (an investigation into the Watergate break-in) by firing the special prosecutor, after first firing the Attorney General who refused to fire the special prosecutor. No—the Constitution is not perfect. And Brettschneider readily acknowledges that. But he also argues that taking the oath of office means one should not subvert the core values of the rule of law. In other words, the presidency is not always just about upholding the technical words of the Constitution, but also about upholding the ideals the United States was built on.
If one were to read Brettschneider's prior writings, there can be no question that he is talking about our current president. Yet, he skillfully writes this book fairly and evenly, and it is not until we turn to the acknowledgement at the book's end that we understand his true inspiration: “… I was unprepared for anything like the 2016 presidential campaign. Suddenly, proposals to violate the Constitution that had been the stuff of far-fetched classroom hypotheticals became just another part of the agenda for a presidential candidate who would soon win the election.”
Brettschneider brings us the Constitution by making the reader a hypothetical future president met with differing hypothetical (or not so hypothetical) scenarios. As if to say, if you were president aware of your constitutional powers and limitations would you unilaterally and secretly begin a covert war without consulting with the Congress; would you direct your Administration to stop any foreigner at the border simply because he was coming from a Muslim-populated country; would your choice for attorney general be motivated by defending the Constitution or defending you; would you make an interim appointment to the cabinet of a person lacking the essential qualifications simply because he supported your vision of America, or at least what you promised your “base” (think, wall)? Essentially making you the decider of how the presidential oath of office should be carried out requires the reader to understand the Founding Fathers' goals, far better than just what the author thinks about them.
Relying on historical context, acts of the legislature and case law, Brettschneider presents us with issues that are all relevant today (perhaps today more than ever)—presidency as a bully pulpit, executive orders, the First Amendment (John Adams was, indeed, the first president who tried to silence his critics), the president's right to his religious beliefs, appointment of justices, declarations of war, the Congressional check and impeachment. And he asks a frighteningly relevant question: What would happen if a president simply refused to follow a court order? It is, parenthetically, worth noting that Brettschneieder discusses how a rogue president who violates his oath is not above the law and can in fact be criminally indicted.
With his vast depth of knowledge, and given today's turbulent times, Brettschneider provides an accessible blueprint for all that the presidency was meant to be. And the reader cannot help but reflect on Trump's presidency in every chapter. With that in mind, Brettschneider, significantly, reminds us all—citizens and aspiring citizens—that the president ultimately is checked not by the Constitution, but by the American people demanding that it be respected.
Joel Cohen and Dale J. Degenshein both practice law at Stroock & Stroock & Lavan. Mr. Cohen is the author of 'Blindfolds Off: Judges on How They Decide' and 'Broken Scales: Reflections on Injustice', to which Ms. Degenshein contributed. They are currently working on a book about oaths, including the presidential oath.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'We Learn Much From the Court's Mistakes': Law Journal Review of 'The Worst Supreme Court Decisions, Ever!'
6 minute read'Midnight in Moscow': A Memoir From the Front Lines of Russia's War Against the West
9 minute read'There Are Heroes in Every Story': Review of 'The Eight: The Lemmon Slave Case and the Fight for Freedom'
9 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Litera Acquires Document Automation Startup Offices & Dragons
- 2Patent Trolls Come Under Increasing Fire in Federal Courts
- 3Transforming Dispute Processes in Law: The Impact of Large Language Models
- 4Daniel Habib to Serve as Next Attorney-in-Charge of NY Federal Defender Appeals Unit
- 5Protecting Attorney-Client Privilege in the Modern Age of Communications
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250