Labaton Name Partner Steps Back as New Chairman Takes the Reins
After about a year co-chairing Labaton alongside founder Larry Sucharow, securities litigator Christopher Keller is now leading the firm on his own.
January 09, 2019 at 09:00 AM
4 minute read
Labaton Sucharow, a top plaintiffs firm in the securities and antitrust class action world, has completed a leadership transition to install New York-based securities litigation partner Christopher Keller as the sole chairman after about a year of co-chairing the firm alongside name partner Lawrence Sucharow.
Sucharow stepped into a chairman emeritus role effective Jan 1. and will remain on the firm's executive committee in a non-voting role. That change comes for Sucharow after more than 40 years at Labaton and more than 20 years in top leadership roles as managing partner and chairman or co-chair. The firm's other namesake, Edward Labaton, remains a partner.
Keller, meanwhile, has spent nearly 20 years at Labaton after joining the firm in 2000. While he has served as co-chair since late 2017, that was not his first leadership position at the firm. Starting in 2003, Keller led the firm's case development group that evaluates potential legal claims for Labaton's institutional investor clients.
Sucharow said that as he takes a step back from day-to-day management, he believes Labaton will be in good hands with Keller at the helm. The two lawyers have been working closely together for nearly 20 years and have similar approaches to practicing law and leadership, Sucharow said, explaining that Keller served as his associate before making partner.
“Chris brought that same type of energy to the law,” Sucharow said. “We fit very well together. For me, he had a lot of the attributes that I would have been looking for in a successor.”
Sucharow also noted that Labaton has been planning a leadership transition for several years. Elevating Keller in December 2017 to a co-chair role was part of the succession plan, allowing him to work continue working closely with Sucharow before taking the reins on his own.
The gradual transition also had the benefits of signaling to the firm's clients and staff members that, while a change was coming, it wouldn't cause any major disruptions, Sucharow said. He also noted that law firm succession is particularly tricky when the founders are handing the leadership to a younger generation for the first time, and Labaton wanted to avoid the pitfalls that some firms experience during such a transition.
“What usually happens in an entrepreneurial firm is that the leader, the builder, the founder doesn't know enough to get out of the way,” Sucharow said. “Without planning for it, it can work out to be problematic.”
Under Sucharow's leadership, Labaton has cemented its place among the country's top securities class action firms. Labaton also handles antitrust cases and, starting in 2011, has housed an ever-expanding whistleblower practice led by partner Jordan Thomas, a former Securities and Exchange Commission official.
For his part, Keller said in an interview that he intends to follow Sucharow's example, saying the longtime firm leader put Labaton on solid footing that positions it well for future years. He also stressed that the transition has been seamless in large part because Sucharow has worked so closely with Keller for years一they've collaborated on most of the key decisions that have shaped the firm's recent trajectory.
“Larry has had a very egalitarian approach to management and leadership,” Keller said.
Beyond ensuring a smooth leadership change, Keller said he plans to maintain a forward-looking approach that also served the firm well under Sucharow. He explained that Labaton has taken pains to make itself adaptable so it can both react to and predict changes as they emerge in securities litigation and in the investment markets at the heart of those cases. In the near term that could mean looking out for a potential recession after a long run of bull markets, while also looking for opportunities to pursue individual cases for institutional investors in addition to class actions.
“The expectation is that we will continue to meet the challenges of a new marketplace,” Keller said. “[Larry] and I are both visionaries in the sense that we like to see what's coming, we like to anticipate where the market is headed.”
|Read More:
Labaton Sucharow Names Securities Litigator to Serve as Firm Co-Chairman
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhy Is It Becoming More Difficult for Businesses to Mandate Arbitration of Employment Disputes?
6 minute readEuropean, US Litigation Funding Experts Look for Commonalities at NYU Event
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250