Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. has agreed to pay $800 million to settle class actions and governmental investigations over its “EcoDiesel” vehicles.
The deal, announced Thursday, resolved claims that Fiat Chrysler installed software in 100,000 vehicles nationwide that cheated emissions tests. It included a $307 million class action settlement and $400 million in civil penalties to federal and state regulators. A hearing for preliminary approval of the class action settlement is set for Jan. 23 in San Francisco federal court.
“We're very pleased to present to the federal court today a class action agreement that will provide substantial cash compensation to the owners and lessees of Fiat Chrysler EcoDiesel vehicles while giving them back the car they were promised—a car that delivers on high performance and low emissions,” said Elizabeth Cabraser, of San Francisco's Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, in a conference call with the media Thursday. Cabraser was lead counsel in the multidistrict litigation against Fiat Chrysler over its EcoDiesel vehicles.
“Importantly,” she noted, “this class consumer agreement will aid our environment by assuring these EcoDiesels become true EcoDiesel vehicles and no longer pollute the environment.”
The agreements were similar to those carved out in a $14.7 billion settlement with Volkswagen in 2016 over its vehicles' fuel emissions. Cabraser also was lead plaintiffs counsel in that case, and Robert Giuffra of Sullivan & Cromwell represented both Volkswagen and Fiat Chrysler in their separate agreements.
New York Attorney General Letitia James estimated that both the Fiat Chrysler and Bosch deals would give the state $171 million.
“Fiat Chrysler and Bosch attempted to pull the wool over the eyes of American consumers, and pollute their way to the bank, but the Office of Attorney General will not stand for that type of behavior from any company,” she said Thursday.
New York and Connecticut, which will receive $4.3 million from both companies, were part of a leadership team of nine states.
“Vehicle emission standards exist as a way to protect the air we all breathe, and companies that knowingly seek to circumvent those standards will be held accountable,” said Connecticut Attorney General William Tong. ”These settlements are critically important in righting the wrongs of the emissions cheating scandal.”
But Cabraser noted some “key differences” between the settlements. The Chrysler settlement involved fewer than the 475,000 vehicles featured in that of Volkswagen. Further, Fiat Chrysler consumers will be able to keep driving their cars after a software fix that is available for two years following the settlement's final approval. Volkswagen's deal, in contrast, included buybacks for many of its “clean diesel” vehicles.
And unlike Volkswagen, Fiat Chrysler did not admit liability.
“We acknowledge that this has created uncertainty for our customers, and we believe this resolution will maintain their trust in us,” said Mark Chernoby, Fiat Chrysler's head of North American safety and regulatory compliance, in a statement Thursday.
Fiat Chrysler was responsible for $280 million of the class action settlement, with software maker Robert Bosch GmbH contributing $27.5 million. In a separate deal announced Thursday, Bosch agreed to pay $98 million to attorneys general actions in 49 states and U.S. jurisdictions, including the District of Columbia, plus $5 million to the National Association of Attorneys General, to resolve emissions investigations involving both Volkswagen and Fiat Chrysler. That deal excluded California and West Virginia. And Texas, according to a Bosch spokeswoman, “supports the settlement in principle, but is not joining at this point for some state-specific issues.”
“Legal disputes would have resulted in lengthy and costly proceedings in numerous U.S. states and with a large number of different claimants,” said Stefan Hartung, chairman of Bosch's Mobility Solutions business sector, in a statement. “As an innovation leader, we want to devote our attention and resources to developing our businesses and to intensifying our efforts to shape the future in our areas of activity.”
The government portion of the Fiat Chrysler deal included about $400 million in civil penalties, of which $86 million went to attorneys general in 50 states.
California's portion of the Fiat Chrysler deal was $13.5 million. That amount, along with $45.8 million in penalties for violations of environmental laws and a $19 million mitigation payment, gave the Golden State a total of $78.4 million.
“California's emission standards exist to protect our residents and the environment from harmful pollution,” said Attorney General Xavier Becerra in a statement Thursday. “Fiat Chrysler tried to evade these standards by installing software to cheat emissions testing.”
Other government regulators involved in the deal included the U.S. Department of Justice, on behalf of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and the California Air Resources Board, which received $305 million. U.S. Customs and Border Protection received another $6 million.
In the class action, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California early on appointed Kenneth Feinberg to serve as settlement master. Last year, the judge allowed claims to go forward against Fiat Chrysler under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
Thursday's deal did not include a request for attorneys fees or expenses, which lawyers plan to file by Feb. 25. A motion for settlement filed Thursday said, “Fiat Chrysler and Bosch reserve all rights to object to an award of attorney's fees and/or expenses beyond what they believe to be reasonable.”
The affected vehicles were Jeep Grand Cherokees and Dodge Ram 1500s, model years 2014 through 2016. Consumers who bring their vehicles in for the software fixes would be eligible for an extended warranty, estimated to cost $105 million, and, for most class members, cash payments of $3,075—although former owners and lessees also can make claims.
“The owners and lessees of these vehicles are literally the engines driving the repair program,” Cabraser said. “They're the ones who will be bringing in their vehicles and getting repairs done.”
She said class members who still own their cars could make claims within 18 months after the settlement's final approval. Under the deal, Fiat Chrysler will have to pay an additional $6,000 per vehicle in penalties if it does not obtain a claims rate of 85 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllNew York Top Court Says Clickwrap Assent Binds Plaintiff's Personal-Injury Claim to Arbitration in Uber Case
New York Sues Charter Bus Operators for $708 Million Over Migrant Transport
Ex-Nikola CEO Sentenced to 4 Years for Securities and Wire Fraud in SDNY
Trending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250